Let’s first remember that the Cub Scouting program of activities and achievements is age- and grade level-based.  I'm sure your intentions are well-meaning; but there’s absolutely no reason why either Tiger Cubs or Cub Scouts need to learn how to build a fire.  Yes, learning how to check one's home for fire hazards and learning what to do in case of a fire is valuable, and this is incorporated into specific achievements at both the Wolf and Bear levels.  Then, when a boy becomes a Webelos Scout, he can learn what you're suggesting when he does requirement 7 of the Outdoorsman activity badge.

Yup, "over the top" is right on the money.  Of course tossing a football around is OK in Scouts!  So are impromptu or pick-up games of baseball, volleyball, stick-ball, street or ice hockey, soccer, basketball, and on and on!

NetCommish Comment:  Not only are they permitted, BSA has a special Scouting Soccer program and a supporting website selling Boy Scouts of America Soccer Uniforms and equipment at http://www.scoutsoccerstuff.com/.

There are three ways for a boy to be eligible to join Boy Scouts, and any one of these does the job:

1) Earn the Arrow of Light rank, OR

2) Complete fifth grade, OR

3) Be 11 years old.

Now you’ve been working with Webelos Scouts in your den for more than a year, and there are at least four more months available for completion of the Arrow of Light, in order to cross over in (or at the end of) February 2008.  If you have a few stragglers, who don't finish till, let's say, March instead of February, then they can receive their Arrow of Light and then cross over at that time.  But, frankly, I don't understand what the problem is... I've seen boys not only complete the AoL but go on to earn every one of the Webelos activity badges -- that's twelve more, after the eight required for the Webelos and AoL ranks!  Is there a problem here?

The salute is a two-step procedure.  The first step is to bring the hand to the salute position, and the second is to return the hand to the side. Thus, "Scout...salute" are the words used to signal the first step and "Two" signals the second step.  Cool huh?

Nope, it sure isn’t, especially when troops often tend to have “double-standards,” such as wear your full uniform to courts of honor but it’s OK to wear just the shirt to troop meetings and such.  The uniform inspection is an opportunity to emphasize and reward the positive; not “ding” the negative.  Here’s how to do it, in the most positive of ways:

- At the close of week 1’s troop meeting, the Scoutmaster announces that, next week, every Scout should come dressed as if he’s going to his own Eagle court of honor.  This is followed up with a mailed (or emailed) announcement to the same effect that goes to every troop family (this way, no can claim lack of knowledge).

- Then, at the beginning of week 2’s meeting, right after the opening ceremony, all patrols are given a few minutes to check their uniforms for completeness and accuracy, using the Uniform Inspection Form (go to http://www.scouting.org/nav/enter.jsp?s=xx&c=lc for a copy of this form).  Next, you’re introduced, and, working through the Senior Patrol Leader and Patrol Leaders, you carry out the inspection. 

Now here’s the most important part: You have in your pocket a bunch of small rewards (can be bite-sized candy bars, or an inexpensive Scout trinket like a “Good Turn coin,” or something else along these lines) and you give one to every Scout who is 100% on the money (or, failing this, to at least one Scout who is the most nearly accurately attired).

Of course, you’d need to be sure your own uniform is up to snuff, and you may need to counsel the Scoutmaster and any ASMs about theirs. But this is all part of helping the troop look more like Boy Scouts, which in turn helps them all act more like Boy Scouts!

No, you probably won't run afoul of the national office.  But you're sure likely to run afoul of the Scouts and their parents.  Their Mohawks, spikes, hair coloring, Johnny Tackle-Box piercing jewels and body art have already been accepted (however reluctantly) by their parents, schools, churches, temples, and teams.  So who are you to start dictating to them in areas you have no business putting your nose in?  You're not the fashionista police; you're the Scoutmaster.  Not only in these areas but in the area of attire, the only things you can encourage are what's on pages 12 and 13 of the Boy Scout Handbook.  You really need to stick to that, unless you really enjoy the prospect of wrapping yourself around your own axle.  Never keep this far from the front of your thinking: If these boys don't like what's going on in the troop, they're outa there and that's their right.  WE are there for THEM; not the other way around.  This doesn't mean you have to be a pushover... Getting and keeping boys in the full Scout uniform is challenge enough, and enough for any troop and Scoutmaster.

Actually, I'm a bit confused... In the first place, this Scout of yours who is "racing through advancement" is, according to the Boy Scout Handbook, perfectly correct in setting a pace for himself as an individual Scout (see page 14: "you can advance at your own pace"), but I get the impression you have a problem with his possibly being Life rank at age 13, simply on the basis of age.  I also note that while on the one hand he's obviously completing the necessary requirements, earning the merit badges, fulfilling the leadership responsibilities (You even mention that he's done "a fine job" as Patrol Leader and Den Chief), and living up to the spirit of Scouting (You mention that "he does fine living the Scout Oath"), you want him to slow down. Why?  According to you, he'll "enjoy the experience" more if he slows down, but are you really so sure of that?  He seems to be doing just fine, in many ways.  I'm also confused by your comments that on the one hand that he did fine as a Patrol Leader and Den Chief and then on the other hand that he's lacking in being a role model.  It's pretty unusual to be both of these at the same time, and I'm wondering how this is possible. 

As far as what he brought to summer camp (for a week, I'm guessing), are you absolutely sure that (a) you, as Scoutmaster, were crystal-clear on what to bring and (b) he wasn't subject to his own parents' whims on what to bring?  But, more importantly, how did he cope with having such little gear at camp?  If he managed to make it through the week intact and not too smelly, maybe this was a good "learning experience" for him?  After all, it sounds like everyone survived the week!

Coming back around now, remember from reading your Scoutmaster Handbook and from the Scoutmaster- specific training you took, that every boy is different and that your job, as Scoutmaster, is to help each boy bring out the best in himself -- That's not his job; that’s YOUR job!

So, finally, your question about the Scoutmasters Conference. I'd have to say that if he's completed the requirements for the next rank, is having fun in Scouting and his patrol and troop, and is otherwise an OK Scout, then, yes, you are definitely obligated to encourage him to keep on and to schedule a board of review for him.

Look at it this way for just a moment: If he makes Eagle by, say, age 13, you've got an Eagle Scout in your troop for nearly another five years, if you play your cards right!  In talking with his parents, perhaps you've learned from them that this is simply the way this particular young man approaches life... He GOES AFTER IT rather than merely drifting through it.  Tell you the truth, give us ten boys like this and we can change the world!

                               - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Before leaving off, let’s for a moment take a sharper look at a Scout who shows up for a week of summer camp with the clothes on his back, and just an extra t-shirt and a couple of pairs of socks, but no sleeping bag, no toiletry kit, no swim trunks, no towel(s), no jacket, and no personal first aid kit, compass, knife, change of footgear, or even underwear.  This says something's seriously wrong.  Whether the problem lies with the Scout or his parents or somewhere else, to avoid possible future endangerment, perhaps the troop needs to try some other techniques for communicating what should be brought on any outings, whether week-long or weekend or day hike.

At Philmont, for instance, before trek crews hit the trail, there's a total gear shakedown right at base camp.  Everyone unpacks everything, the Ranger assigned to the crew looks over every single piece of gear each person has, tells 'em what to leave behind (there are lockers expressly for this) and tells 'em what to go into the training post and buy 'cause they didn't pack it and they're gonna need it.  Maybe your troop needs to start doing something along these lines, patrol-by-patrol, with the Patrol Leaders doing what the Rangers do (with your pre-"prepping" them, of course, so everyone's on the same page).

Another way to do this is to have a checklist of all items to be brought, and a list of items not to be brought, with a place for the Scout’s and his parent's signatures at the bottom.  The Scout signs that he's got everything on the checklist and this is countersigned by his parent, plus there's a second place for his parent's signature that he's not packed a Walkman, iPod, cell phone, Gameboy, etc.

Please give these some thought, so that you never again have a repeat of this Scout’s unfortunate lack of good gear preparation.

Dear Andy,

Yes, there's definitely something wrong here.  The excuse that "well, we're a volunteer organization" can hold water for a week or so, but definitely not months.  Your son should have had his board of review three months ago.  It is absolutely unfair and unreasonable for this sort of emotionally debilitating delay to have occurred.  Besides, this delay not of his making has just cost your son an Eagle Palm, should he decide to pursue these!  Your son (not you) should waste no further time in contacting your council service center for the name and contact information of the council advancement chair, and then contacting that person by phone or in-person (NO EMAIL!) to request a council-level board of review instead of being told time and time again that he'll have to wait till they get around to him.

First and most important, unless you like being labeled a member of "The Patch Police," let this drop. 

Of course there's district committee training (at least in some councils, if not every last one), so a "trained" strip worn by a district committee member just might be legit.  Of course silver shoulder loops are worn by anyone in a district- or council-level position, Commissioners and committee members, and chairs.  And of course the Arrowhead Honor is worn by serving Commissioners (regardless of what their level was when they earned it, even if that level has changed).  But we also know that although our fellow Scouters may change out one badge, that doesn’t guarantee that they’ll change out others to correspond.  Have you ever, for instance, noticed just how many Quality Unit strips can fit on a short-sleeved shirt?  But this is small change stuff, my Scouting friend!  We have bigger fish to fry!

NetCommish Comment:  Your Council website has a training page that lists a District Committee Training Workshop.  Philmont also has training for the District Key 3, Advancement, Council & District Activities, The District Committee, and more.  There are many opportunities for a District Committee member to get relevant training. 

This fellow's stated reason for wearing the patch isn't correct, but you have to ask what you have to gain by nit-picking.  If the guy gets irritated and quits are you going to pick up his load and carry it too?  If an animosity results, does that help the Scouts we are serving?  This is where we need to keep to the big picture and the goals of our roles and not let the trees prevent us from seeing the forest.

Start by pointing your Scoutmaster to Chapter 3 of the Scoutmaster Handbook, which describes what a Boy-Led Troop is, how it operates, and how any troop that doesn't do this just isn't delivering the Boy Scout program.  Of course the Scouts in this troop are bored... Nothing that's happening is their idea.  Instead, it's the brain-child of someone who's probably two or three times their average age.  That's like, out of touch with reality.  Show me a troop that doesn't use The Patrol Method, including the PLC, and I'll show you a troop that maybe looks like Scouts but is totally clueless.

Your best quick fix option, I think, is to get this Scoutmaster (and if you can, the committee, too) to some current training.  Unless they know in no uncertain terms what they're supposed to be doing, Scouting won't be happening anytime soon.

Also, talk to your fellow Commissioners and find a model troop in the area, then invite this Scoutmaster to go with you (Buddy System here!) to pay a brief visit!  That might help open his eyes to how things can be in his own troop!

Since every locale and its needs are different, the best place answers to your questions are at your district's monthly Cub Scout Leader Round Tables.  Go, with others from your pack, and I'll bet dollars to donuts someone there will have some great suggestions for you!

1. Read Chapter 3 of the Scoutmaster Handbook.

2. The Scoutmaster is supposed to be listening to the desires of the Scouts, as they plan their activities in their Patrol Leaders Council meetings (which, by the way, is run by the Senior Patrol Leader; not the Scoutmaster).  If the Scoutmaster will not or cannot do this, for whatever reason or reasons, then the committee is obligated to replace him with someone who does understand what the correct role of the Scoutmaster is.

3. This can be collaborative rather than "separate but equal" or some such.  A substantial discussion of this topic is covered in Scoutmaster-specific and also in Troop Committee training.  Get your people to training, and 99% will become crystal clear.

The place you want to go for information and insights isn’t the council service center--they 99.9% handle administrative stuff.  Instead, go to your council's website and click on training:

http://www.doubleknot.com/openrosters/ViewOrgPageLink.asp?LinkKey=5763&orgkey=62

Now, find the training you need, in your own or a nearby district, and go as a group and get this done.  I'll guarantee that most of your problems will disappear as if by magic!

Here are some excerpts from, the BSA website:

”Youth Member Behavior Guidelines: One of the developmental tasks of childhood is to learn appropriate behavior. Children are not born with an innate sense of propriety and they need guidance and direction... Adult leaders of Scouting units are responsible for monitoring the behavior of youth members and interceding when necessary... Parents of youth members who misbehave should be informed and asked for assistance in dealing with it. The BSA does not permit the use of corporal punishment by unit leaders when disciplining youth members.”

The last line is important to note.  Further, the BSA stipulates in no equivocal terms that hazing in any form is prohibited.

For more, and more detail, go to:

http://www.Scouting.org/nav/enter.jsp?s=xx&c=ds&terms=behavior

With this information as platform, two aspects should be considered: a) What was it about your son's behavior that triggered the Den Leader's action? and b) How did your son respond to the Den Leader's action first action (i.e., the one before depriving your son of his cap and neckerchief)?

I can tell you from experience that a "time out" works much better than a "punishment" because the time out ends whatever behavior's going on, whereas punishment doesn't necessarily accomplish this.  We also need to recognize that what one person might characterize as minor misbehavior and what another might consider significantly disruptive can be the same actual behavior.

So, I have two suggestions for you.  The first is to recognize that this whole thing may be in the category of hiccup; not major flu epidemic. The second is to have a quiet, private conversation with your son's Den Leader (NO EMAIL!) in which you mutually agree that, as parent, you'll provide a little stronger guidance to your son on what's acceptable behavior in a den meeting and what isn't, and he'll give your son his cap and neckerchief back and use the "time out" (lasts about a minute or so, by the way) approach instead.

I'll only give you the answers if you PROMISE you won't join the "Patch Police"! Promise?? Scout’s Honor???  Well, OK, then...

IR, SC, and COR have all been different names for essentially the same set of responsibilities.  As these names were changing, position (and other) badge motifs were changing, too but not necessarily concurrently.  There are two different blues for the CO patch, for instance.  Others changed, too.  For instance, SM historically had a green background; now it's tan.  I'm going guess that whoever the new design team was, every time there was a major shift (remember when they all had Mylar borders?) in motif, maybe they paid attention to leadership strands, and maybe they didn't.  My personal all-time favorites where back in the days when there were no words at all on any position badge, and when you had to know what the colors meant to know what position was being worn.  To me, these made a lot more sense than patches with no mystique at all, almost along the lines of “Patch-Reading For Dummies.” When there were no words, I believe we paid a lot more attention, because this meant that we had to learn to "read" each other's uniforms.  This is pretty much a lost art these days.

On your second question, I agree that a "'TRAINED" strip looks pretty over-the-top on a shirt with a Distinguished Commissioner square knot and/or a Commissioner's Arrowhead Honor.  But, since most folks don't know what they're looking at anymore (see above), maybe it's OK—Setting the example is a leadership trait, after all!

I can't even begin to imagine how upsetting this situation must be for you--Twice!  Let's see what we can do here...

Back in '73, when you were presented your Eagle medal, you would also have received a wallet-sized advancement card, and a larger certificate signed by the Chief Scout Executive at that time (in 1973, this would have been Alden G. Barber).  Do you have either of those?  Either one of those would be proof, and you could send a photocopy to the council office and your former troop.  The council that now includes Cle Elum, WA is the Grand Columbia Council-BSA, 12 North 10th Avenue, Yakima, WA 98902 (Yes, it has a website, and the phone number's available there).  I'd recommend re-contacting the Scout Executive of this council and asking him or her to really dig into the old records to help.  Absent a satisfactory result here (or in addition to it), contact the National Director of Advancement at the BSA National Office—Boy Scouts of America, P.O. Box 152079, Irving, Texas 75015-2079—and ask the same question.  This office has access to all of the Eagle Scout records of the BSA, all the way back to Day One.

Yes, I definitely remember you, and I remember your wayward District Commissioner.  At the time you first wrote about that troop's problems with him, I recommended that their unit leaders and committee chair have an in-person conversation with their District Chair and District Executive and get this guy to stop interfering with a troop that (a) isn't his responsibility in the first place and has a Unit Commissioner (you), and (b) doesn't want him messing things up.  Obviously, things didn't turn out that way.  One of the reasons—now identified—is that he's been an ASM in the same troop, so he can change hats whenever he likes and you never know which one he's wearing (except that he's got both of 'em on backwards!).  Of course, it's unclear to me why no affirmative action was taken for two years.  At any rate, the troop is now on the right track to solving its own problem by removing him from their roster.

As to your present problem, I’m sure you keep your annual registration cards, and those are all you need to refute the allegation that you’re not a registered UC.  If you can’t find them, just call your council registrar for verification and a replacement membership card.  Then tell that jerk to go pound sand*.

* Just so there’s no mistake in interpretation here: "The origin of the expression ‘go pound sand’ is from a longer expression, not to know (have enough sense to) pound sand down a rat hole. Filling rat holes with sand is menial work, and telling someone to pound sand down a rat hole is like telling them to go fly a kite. The expression dates from circa 1912" (Source: Urban Dictionary)

I don't know about a recording, but check this out...

http://www.Scoutingaround.com/boy_Scouts/johnwayne/index.html

Dear Andy,

First, congratulations to that mom and her four Eagle sons!

Yup, you've pretty much got it right!  In the BSA Catalog or a local Scout Shop, there are miniature Eagle pins for sale that can be worn in the lapel buttonhole of a sport or suit jacket (there are other items for "civilian wear" available, too, but the pin is the most commonly worn).

However, if any of these gentlemen is attending a Boy Scout Court of Honor, it's certainly appropriate, for that occasion, to wear the actual medal pinned on the left breast pocket of a sport or suit jacket.

Yes, it does matter: The only place the merit badge sash is worn is over the right shoulder.  As for being worn at a wake or funeral, that would be optional. 

As long as we’re on the subject of wakes and funerals, it’s definitely not inappropriate for a Scout honor guard to wear black armbands or even black neckerchiefs, made for this type of occasion.

There's a poster-sized Cub Scout advancement tracking sheet that most Scout Shops sell for just a few bucks. It not only helps you keep track, but it also encourages your Cub Scouts and their parents to keep going! Get one for each den to use: Wolf, Bear, and Webelos.  Then, take a look at PackMaster^® software.

NetCommish Comment:  You may also want to download the spreadsheets available at http://cubmaster.org/powwow.asp

This may be just what you’re looking for: www.euxnetwork.net/

Yup, somebody told you incorrectly.  Centered on right pocket (the “temporary” position, which really means “at the wearer’s discretion”) is the place. (BTW, my youngest son went to that same NOAC, too!)

Fundamentals here.  The Application for Merit Badge (aka "Blue Card") has three parts.  One is the Counselor's Record; showing the Scout’s name, Troop number, Merit Badge name, and date completed; torn off at the perforations and retained by the MB Counselor on completion of the requirements by each Scout.  The second is the Applicant's Record; showing the Scout’s name, the Merit Badge name, date of completion, MB Counselor's signature, and Scoutmasters confirming signature; which (per the instructions at the bottom of this section) the Scout himself retains for his own permanent personal records.  The third section; containing all of the information I've already mentioned, plus the date the MB certificate and badge were presented to the Scout; is retained in the Troop records.  Thus, the only section you have to be in any way concerned about is the third, and only if the certificate and badge haven't been presented yet.  If they have, then it's a done deal. If not, then the information needed to do so can be reconstructed from the second part: the Applicant's Record.