This is an unabashed promotion for Captain John Green and his
goal of sending $10,000 to the volunteers stationed right now in
Baghdad who are bringing Scouting back to the youth of Iraq!
John bought these patches from his own wallet. He's selling
them for $10, and sending all funds raised to the Green
Zone Council. He's not reimbursing himself. He has just
a few left from the stock he bought, so let's get behind him and
finish this!
You can contact John at
John.Green3@us.army.mil
Please do it TODAY!
Dear Andy,
Is there a way to get
the BSA's by-laws and policies? Are there any rules or
regulations about troops using leadership contracts that a Scout
must sign, that can strip him of his leaders position or deny
him his rank? (William Dorr)
Any individual or bunch
of adults who believe they have the power to deny a Scout his
duly earned rank, or the power to delay an ambitious Scout from
advancing, or the power to take a rank away from a Scout once
he's earned it, or who fail to realize that they, the adults,
have only one job and that is to help Scouts succeed, have no
business being in the Scouting program. If you're aware of
anyone associated with your troop who has succumbed to any of
these catastrophes of thinking, give 'em the gate.
It's not Scouts who must
"toe the line," it's the adults. Any adult who sees himself or
herself as cop, watchdog, final arbiter of performance, judge of
character or leadership qualities, or any other such nonsense,
same thing: Boot 'em out.
There's only one thing
that keeps a Scout from achieving his personal best: Adults who
don't believe he's "ready."
Hi Andy,
I have a question that
we need clarification on and perhaps you and/or your readers can
help... Requirement 9a for Camping merit badge states that the
20 days and nights of camping must be “Scout related.” Would
this include camping done while a Scout was a Cub, such as
Webelos Resident Camp or camping with a Troop for their
advancement? (Maggie Guglielmo, CC, Buckeye Council, OH)
Thanks for asking! The
answer's simple and uncomplicated: Boy Scouting, including
fulfilling requirements for ranks and merit badges, begins when
a boy becomes a Boy Scout.
Dear Andy,
Thanks for your advice
about a year ago; it's truly helped my unit. We had three
Venturers earn the Gold, Silver, and Ranger awards in the past
year and more on the way!
Today I was catching
up on your column and was reading the bit about “100 Scouts” in
your March 25th column. I had another experience
today that may be worth sharing...
I teach at a large
semi-urban high school in Pennsylvania. Today the school's
newspaper had a photo shoot to recognize the Eagle Scouts in the
school's Senior Class. This was really cool, because fully
twenty young men were recognized for this, and they also
included seven of the faculty who were also Eagles! It was a
very cool experience because, as a teacher I don't, always get
to see these students as Scouts, and it definitely gives a new
connection to some students and some of my co-workers. (Jason
Capone, Council Venturing Chair & Eagle Class of 2000, Minsi
Trails Council, PA)
That's really cool!
THANKS from an Eagle Class of '57!
Dear Andy,
I'm currently serving
as a Bear Den Leader. When I joined the pack last fall, I
quickly found out that there was a lot of turmoil in the pack
that had carried over from some leaders in the past and a couple
still in the pack. One of these people is the other Bear Den
Leader in the pack. I brought to the pack many years of scouting
experience as an Eagle Scout and was welcomed. I witnessed a lot
of things that the pack could work on, as well as things that I
just flat out didn't agree with—many of these could be easily
addressed by just following Scouting's regulations. The other
Bear Den Leader has a strong personality and seems to "shoot
from the hip" with answers based on her opinion rather than
following BSA guidelines and regulations. When someone disagrees
with her, her response is to swear and yell until she says what
she wants, and then she walks away or hangs up the phone. I was
approached by the Cubmaster and his wife (who is now our
Committee Chair) for help, since they were new to the positions
and had had trouble with this leader in the past, so I gave them
the information needed to state their case based on BSA
regulations, and quickly found myself at the bad end of the
other Bear DL's rope. I was told that the Pack wanted to get rid
of her, but they didn't know how to do it. Conferences have
happened, and this DL claimed willingness to change her ways, so
the other leaders are giving her room to do this.
But now I'm finding
myself in the hot seat and the very people who came to me for
help seem to be throwing me under the bus. I'm being defamed by
the parents of the other leader's den, who, being naive, put
full confidence in her wrong way of doing things and fully
believe the lies she's telling them. And, despite assurances
that she'll change, she's still refusing to take training, never
completed Youth Protection Training, shows total defiance of the
Cubmaster, in public, refuses to wear a uniform, continues to
have one-on-one interactions with the Cubs in her den, has
actually flirted with others' husbands, and still swears a blue
streak. But, instead of dealing with this woman, the Committee
Chair is now challenging me on everything I do, and has even
announced to other parents that I'm not an Eagle Scout and have
no business being a leader. I have documented items to prove all
of the accusations false, but I keep getting the questions. I'm
now tired and ask, where is my protection and why even after
proving over and over my character and the false accusations do
I still have to be so careful to make sure I have proof of all
that's done and said? The District Executive is now involved,
and I believe is trying to assist the pack in the right
direction, but in the meantime I'm being hung out to dry and the
problems with the other leader are being ignored. This has been
going on since before I joined the pack! I've said that I'm not
afraid to put in writing anything, but I honestly don't believe
these people realize that by verbally and in writing defamation
of me, which is causing problems for my family, is really
against the law. I need help. I refuse to give up my boys and
families who I'm fully committed to, but I'm the one who now is
getting the brunt of this.
I grew up in the Boy
Scouts! I have my Arrow of Light, am a multiple-Palmed Eagle
Scout, and a Vigil Honor member of the Order of the Arrow. But
here I am, having to defend myself as a "Good Scout" around
people with little Scouting experience. What can I do? HELP!
(Name & Council Withheld)
First: The Committee
Chair has the authority to fire that wayward Den Leader. No
explanation is necessary, no "three strikes" rule, no "letters
in the file," no nothing except the agreement of the Chartered
Organization Representative and/or executive officer of the CO.
It's a simple "Thank you for your services; they're no longer
needed." That's it, and it's over. The only cautionary note is
that it's usually a good idea to have someone in the wings who
has already agreed to step in and fill the slot, once it's been
vacated. The removed volunteer has no recourse and it's not
negotiable. It's simply over.
If the CC doesn't have
the stomach for this, then the best thing you can do is to get
out of that pack, because trying to "fix" it "from the inside"
is an exercise in futility.
As for "defending"
yourself and/or "setting the record straight," forget it. I'd
sooner try to teach pigs to fly than waste my time with folks
who are blind to Scouting's True North.
Here's the bottom line:
Depart with grace, find a Scouting unit that can see the big
picture and doesn't tolerate bullies (youth or adult!), and join
up. As for the miscreants, blow-hards, and spineless wonders
you're leaving behind, don't even waste time looking over your
shoulder. Eyes on the horizon, my Scouting friend!
Remember: What and who
you are speaks more loudly to me than anything you might say.
Dear Andy,
In your March 25th Column, Rhonda Hitt asked,
“Are there any rules against taking Cub Scouts rappelling
off a cliff?” and you referred her to the Guide to Safe
Scouting which is the right answer. As an NCS Climbing
and COPE Director, I’d also refer her to Climb On Safely
training, which should be offered by her council at least
once a year. The GTSS is available at the BSA website:
www.scouting.org/healthandsafety.
(Zack Sinsheimer,
Scouter
Services Associate,
Mid-America Council, NE)
Great suggestion! Thanks!
Dear Andy,
What's the difference between a District Committee Member and a
Member-at-Large? I've been looking around the Internet and I've
found the following:
www.wwswd.org/scouting-terms1
- Member-at-Large: A
volunteer at the district level who is available to serve and/or
assist on special projects.
- District Committee:
A group of registered adult Scouters responsible for carrying
out the council program within their district.
www.hurricanedistrict.org/PDF/DistrictNominatingCommittee
- Members at Large:
Individuals of character and standing in the community who,
because of interest, organization experience, ability, or
general knowledge, may be available for service as a chairman or
member of one of the committees in the district or for service
in some special capacity to the district. The incoming district
chair appoints the chairs of the various committees related to
the functions of membership, finance, program, and other special
or ad hoc committee chairs.
www.scouting.org/Media/LOS/All
- District Committee:
Consists of chartered organization repre-sentatives and elected
district members at large, the district committee coordinates
the functions of the district to carry out the policies and
objectives of the council. The executive officer of the district
committee is the district chairperson.
- Member-at-Large:
Elected voting member of a council or district who is not a
chartered organization representative.
But I want to know your opinion. (Ivonne D. Rivera)
An "at-large" member of the district committee is typically one
who doesn't have a specific assignment, such as Vice
Chair-Program or Chair-Friends of Scouting Campaign. However,
members-at-large might serve on a district sub-committee, such
as Program or Friends of Scouting Campaign, under the direction
of a Vice Chair or Chair.
Dear Andy,
Do you have any thoughts on what should qualify as a
troop or patrol activity for First Class requirement 3?
Our troop has considered several types of activities,
some with more support than others, such as: troop
service projects, Eagle Courts of Honor (separate from
regular troop meetings), attending a bridging ceremony
of our parallel pack to welcome new Scouts (we encourage
our Scouts to attend these), Eagle projects, and troop
fund-raisers. Definitely, camping trips and other day
trips and weekend or overnight outings can count toward
this requirement, and we know from the requirement that
at least three of the activities must include overnight
camping.
But who decides what qualifies as an activity for this
require-ment? The Scoutmaster? The Troop Committee? And
what happens if, at a board of review for First Class,
the committee doesn't approve of the activities that a
Scout has listed for the rank, but the Scoutmaster's
initials are there in his handbook, signifying that, for
the Scoutmaster, they're OK?
This is a problem for us right now because we have a
Scout who completed all his First Class requirements,
but the reviewers adjourned the review while they
“checked up on” the activities the Scout has listed
(which the Scoutmaster had signed off on), to determine
if they were “valid” or not.
Our troop provides at least ten traditional outings
every year, one a month except for August and December.
The question is: When a Scout can't attend those, but
does attend other events like those questionable ones
listed above, what do we do? (Kurt Williams, CC)
That First Class requirement is clear and straightforward: Ten
separate troop and/or patrol activities, three of which must be
an overnight camp-out and none of which may be a regular troop
or patrol meeting. Per this language, every one of the examples
you provided meets the requirement, so long as they're troop
and/or patrol activities. For instance, if the Scouts in the
troop are encouraged by the Scoutmaster or others to attend a
pack's bridging ceremony, then this is not "questionable" at
all: It qualifies. Same with a troop service project, of
course—how could it not?! And, since "service hours" aren't
required for First Class, assisting a brother Scout on his Eagle
project would be acceptable by all but the most misanthropic
curmudgeon. And so on.
However, in the case you mentioned, the members of that board of
review were totally out-of-line and need to be either
re-educated or told to go find another job. When a Scoutmaster
has signed off on a requirement, it is absolutely not up to the
board of review to challenge this in front of the Scout, much
less to use this as a way to deny that Scout the rank his
Scoutmaster has already told the reviewers the Scout is ready
for.
There is no "conflict" here, because troop committees absolutely
do not "overrule" Scoutmasters in situations like this, and
shame on them! Call that Scout back in as fast as you can,
apologize to him, and award him his duly earned rank.
Dear Andy,
I'm involved with both a pack and a troop in a small town here
in Connecticut. Because we have well-rounded boys who are
involved in a lot of stuff, we have a lot of overlap among youth
organizations in town—Boys on the soccer team are also Cub
Scouts and our Boy Scouts are in the band or on the baseball
team, too. When it comes to parades, there's invariably that
decision of who to march with, and the laws of physics say that
you can't be in two places at once. One solution I'm
considering is letting the boys march with one organization
while wearing the uniform of another, if the group they're
marching with does not object. I can understand if the pack
wants to maintain the unity of having everyone marching in
uniform, but if a boy wants to walk with the soccer team and
wear the Scout uniform because he wants to show that he's part
of both organizations, does that violate any BSA uniform
guidelines? I've searched
scouting.org
but wasn't able to find anything. (John Tarby, COR/ASM,
Connecticut Yankee Council)
Life is a series of decisions. Many of these are pleasant
and easy; some aren't. Parades represent one of those
decision moments that only the boy or young man can make.
When it come to deciding which to march with, his pack or
troop, soccer team or band, this is the individual decision
of each. Leave it that way. Learning how to make personal
decisions, especially when they're not no-brainers, is a big
part of growing up. Resist the temptation to try to provide
some sort of manufactured middle ground, because there's
really no middle ground: The choice is between option one
and option two and to create an artificial half-way
accommodation diminishes if not undermines both options.
Hi Andy!
Our troop has a delightful group of Scouts who next year will
turn 18 before they graduate from high school. They're great
guys who are still an asset to the troop and enjoying Scouting.
Our troop has always “aged boys out,” and either they disappear
on their 18th birthday or we register them as ASMs
and they're expected to suddenly change roles. We've not managed
to get that to really work, since the Scouts aren't suddenly
ready to swap the role.
So my question is this: Must a Scout either disappear or become
an ASM on his 18th birthday? Is there a rule? Or can a Scout
stay a Scout until he graduates from high school? (Janis
Tipton-King, ASM, San Francisco Bay Area Council, CA)
A young man's 18th birthday marks the end of his Boy Scout
years. This is not dependent on his school grade, and there are
no exceptions other than a permanent severe handicap or
disability that is well documented.
B-P: “Training boy leaders to run their troop is the
Scoutmaster's most important job.” Assuming a normal
progression, in which a Scout reaches Eagle rank some time
between his 14th and 16th birthdays
(although both earlier and later are both certainly OK), has
been elected by his patrol to be their Patrol Leader at least
once, and by his troop to be Senior Patrol Leader, or has been
assigned a leadership position by the Scoutmaster, and has
ultimately progressed to the position of Junior Assistant
Scoutmaster by the time he's 16, the 17-year-old Scout should by
this time be well-steeped in leadership skills and the
servant-leader attitude that accompanies these. So that, by the
time he's 18, he should be well-prepared to step up to the
position of Assistant Scoutmaster, becoming one of the troop's
most important adult leaders (he's have specific responsibility
for the new Scout patrol that graduates from being a Webelos
den, in February or perhaps March at the latest). Why a Scout
would not have this aspiration by the time he's 18 is quite
unfathomable to me, but I do suppose it can happen. In that
case, there's a second option: Venturing.
If you do have Scouts who wish to continue beyond their 18th
birthday in a capacity other than Assistant Scoutmaster, then
form a Venturing Crew for these young men to transfer
into upon reaching age 18. A Venturing Crew is a BSA program
specifically designed for young men (and young women, too!)
between the ages of 14 and 21. It's value-based, just as the Boy
Scout program is, and centers around active adventures, service
to others, and challenging experiences.
For more Venturing info, go to
www.scouting.org/venturing.aspx.
For information on how to organize and charter a Venturing Crew,
contact your Unit Commissioner.
Thanks Andy!
We do want to start up a Venturing Crew, but there's resistance
from the troop committee, based on their fear that Scouts will
become less active in the troop once they reach Venturing age. I
understand the position. With the current group of Scouts, that
seems highly unlikely, but things can change over time and
meanwhile nobody wants to rock the troop boat. But meanwhile we
say goodbye to a lot of great kids and we're are not serving
female youth at all But that's something we need to wrestle with
ourselves. (Janis Tipton-King)
The committee's being as short-sighted as others who claim that
the OA "steals Scouts" from their troop! You can't have it both
ways. If you're OK with losing youth at age 18, so be it. If
you're not, then training older Scouts to become ASMs or
starting a Venturing Crew are your options. BTW, do they really
think the BSA developed a program for older youth designed to
lessen activity?
Dear Andy,
I've been a reader of
your column for several years, and have found it very helpful.
I'd recommend it to any leader—new or experienced.
I've just finished up
my time with a Cub Scout pack that I was involved with for the
last three years as Cubmaster, and where both of my sons earned
the Arrow of Light.
I heartily endorse one
of the methods you described to recruit committee members!
Several months ago, most of the leaders in the pack were leaving
as their sons graduated. I sent out a general letter in our pack
newsletter, not expecting any response, but just to lay the
groundwork. I encouraged parents to volunteer for a position,
or to serve if asked. Several months later, after our Tigers
were almost done with their year, I used your strategy of
writing out the committee positions, with descriptions of
duties, on a 3”x5” card and laying them out on a table during a
pack meeting. We met in a classroom of our chartered
organization, so there was only one door! I positioned myself
and the cards on a table in front of the only door out, and
asked each parent as they left to consider a position. A few
said no thanks, but most looked over the cards and chose one.
I do take issue with
one of your themes that the advancement should be done mostly at
home with the parents. With both my wife and I working, and the
demands of homework (even at the 3rd and 4th
grade levels), and time spent in after-school daycare programs,
I found that most parents didn't take the time to do much
advancement work at home. When I was a Den Leader, I made it a
point to do some advancement work, some work on Arrow Point
projects, and some stuff that was just plain fun. When
springtime rolled, around I'd encourage parents to begin work on
their new Cub Scout book, hoping that when we met again in the
fall they'd have some advancement work done. I never had any
parent (except me) do any advancement work over the summer
months.
The reality today is
that, if a good chunk of advancement isn’t done in the meeting,
then the boys won’t advance. As a parent, I found that
sometimes Cub Scouting, as fun and worthwhile as the program is,
can be just another chore to a lot of parents, and to not do
advancement work in the den meetings is a disservice to the
boys. The way I put it to parents of my den was that we'd
attempt to do some advancement work in the den meetings, but it
was ultimately up the parents if their son advanced. (Scott J.
Dahlqusit, Northern Star Council, MN)
I'm thrilled that the
“card technique” worked for you! It's been used successfully
again and again, by unit leaders and Commissioners across the
country and it almost never fails to produce results.
On Cub Scout advancement, especially Tiger, Wolf, and Bear, when
a Den Leader starts doing advancement stuff in den meetings,
instead of concentrating den activities around the pack's
monthly themes, he or she is undermining the Cub Scout program
at its most fundamental level, and shame on any Den Leader who
makes a practice of this. When a Cub is not advancing, because
parents aren't stepping up to their Akela responsibilities, it's
not time to "rescue" those parents (or their son); it's time for
a parent conference, to re-explain what advancement is all about
and what their responsibilities are, including what's going to
happen when they don't hold up their end of the equation. It's
right there in the Tiger, Wolf, and Bear handbooks, in the
parents' section, for goodness sakes!
The "disservice to the boys" comes from their own parents, and
it's absolutely not the responsibility of the Den Leader to take
up the slack. When parents see other boys receiving their
badges, arrow points, and so on at the monthly pack meetings,
and their kid's warming the bench, they'll either take action so
this doesn't happen again, or they won't, and it's not your job
or anyone else's to do for them what they're not willing to do
for their own son! End of story.
Dear Andy,
Our troop would like to know where to get information on, or
examples for building a camp entrance. (Denice Dewaelsche,
Quivira Council, KS)
This depends on how elaborate the Scouts want to be and how
creative they are. For examples of some wonderful stuff, just
Google "troop gateway" and check out the citations.
Dear Andy,
In our troop, we have a 13 year old Scout going before his board
of review for Star. In his Scoutmaster Conference with me, he
told me that he had to become a Star Scout before another Scout
in the troop, because his dad didn't want the other boy to beat
him to Eagle. I've touched on this lightly in the past, telling
his father that Scouting isn't a competition, but an experience,
but I think it's fallen on deaf ears. It appears that this boy's
his father pushes him in sports and other extra-curricular
activities also, which are none of my concern, but obviously
shows a pattern. I brought this up with my Committee Chair, and
he felt that it wasn't necessarily a bad thing. But in my own
experience as an Eagle Scout and an adult leader (I'm in my
mid-40s), I've found that pushing a boy ruins the fun and can
create burnout at a later date. I'd hate to see this happen. Is
this something I should approach, or should I leave it alone and
let it run it's course? (Rob Hayes, SM)
We can save boys from wayward and useless adult lives through
Scouting. We can save them from bleeding to death with
compresses. We can save them from drowning with rescue
methods. We can save them from expiring with CPR. But we can't
save them from their own parents.
We also can't "fix" parents—I'd soon try to teach a pig to fly!
What we can do, however, is to save these boys and young men
from succumbing to the same mentality as this particular dad,
through Scoutmaster's Conferences. But do tread lightly here, my
Scouting friend, because we're talking about a father-and-son
relationship that's stronger than we'll ever have with this
Scout (and that's as it should be). The key is to help this
young man find a way to succeed for himself first, his father
second, and to maintain a sense that "this is a 'race' that
every Scout can win."
Dear Andy,
My question is about mixing old and current uniform parts.
We have a Scout in our troop who proudly wears his
grandfather’s garrison cap with his present-day uniform. The
troop has no set policy on headgear, or a specified hat that
the Scouts should wear. The other scouts really like this
hat and all would like to have one.
So here’s the problem:
Our Committee Chair has told the Scout that he's not allowed to
wear the vintage hat with the modern uniform because the
old-style can't be mixed with the modern current uniform. But
I've gone to many Scouting events and have seen numerous people
wearing an old-style hat with the current uniform.
Is there a national
policy on this? I've yet to find anything in writing from the
Insignia Guide or anywhere else, and the uniform inspection
sheet doesn't say anything on this matter other than it's a
troop decision as to what headgear to wear. I've heard a
lot of opinions on this, but no factual answer. Can you help me?
(Name Withheld)
In the first place,
what's this malarkey about a Committee Chair having a
conversation of this sort with a Scout? Doesn't he or she know
that it's the Scoutmaster, not anyone on the committee unless
requested by the Scoutmaster, who converses with the Scouts and
that any variation on this is out-of-line?
But, on your question: The BSA's policy—a long-standing one, by
the way—is simple: If it was official "then" it's official NOW!
This includes "mix-and-match." So this Scout's overseas cap is
totally "legal" and shame on a stick-in-the-mud Committee Chair!
Now, let's look at the
positive: If other Scouts think it's cool, why not go online
(eBay, maybe) and see if you can outfit the whole troop with
these! (Frankly, they're a lot more convenient than the current
baseball caps because, when you're not wearing it, you just fold
it over your belt and it never gets crushed, damaged, or lost!)
Dear Andy,
I know that the Kayaking-BSA is intended for Boy Scouts
and that it has several requirements that must be met to get
it, but what about Cub Scouts? Is there a variation of this
award that a Cub Scout can earn, where the requirements
aren't as strict? The reason I ask is because I have two Cub
Scout sons—one is a Bear and the other a Tiger—and we went
out for a family activity this past weekend and while we
were there, we took them kayaking. We used tandem kayaks on
a Level 1 river (maybe a little less than one), and I had
one son with me and my husband had the other with him. The
boys really paddled and helped to get us off of rocks when
we got stuck. They performed like little pro's and we'd like
to recognize their efforts with a Scout award if at all
possible. (Julie McDaniel, DL, Daniel Boone Council, NC)
You're correct that kayaking is not a part of the Cub
Scouting program, and it's likely to remain that way, for
reasons of youth safety, of course. Moreover, you all did
this as a family outing; not as a Cub Scout event. So, if
you want to "reward" your two stalwart sons, your best bet
is to do this personally, within your family.
Dear Andy,
We have a situation in the troop where a lot of boys are causing
trouble. Our new Scoutmaster is trying to get a handle on it. In
the past year the trouble (violence, threats, putting others in
harm's way) has gotten so out of control that four Scouts have
been asked to leave the troop. Currently, my son is one of the
boys causing trouble—he's rough-housing and letting it get out
of control till someone gets hurt. At the first couple of
incidents, he was warned. But, three weeks ago, when something
else happened, his leadership position was taken away. (The new
Scoutmaster is trying to get the troop to be more boy-led. Yay
for that!) Then, a week later, he pushed another Scout to the
ground. His punishment is that he's not allowed to go on any
troop outings for the next three months, and is “on probation”
for six months (but he is allowed to participate in
service-related activities and he can work on advancement during
his probation period).
While I agree with his punishment in general, I don't agree with
one thing: In the past three months, he's worked on Cycling
merit badge, and this coming weekend is the final 50-mile ride,
but he's not allowed to participate, because the Scoutmaster
deems this an outing, and my son is banned from outings for
three months. Is the Scoutmaster permitted to keep my son from
completing his merit badge? The Counselor for Cycling has said
that my son can complete the 50-mile ride on his own, and has
even told us of a ride taking place in a couple of weeks that he
could join up with and do. But my question is: Can the
Scoutmaster deny him the right to complete his merit badge for
any reason? In reading through your columns, I don't think he
can do this. (Name & Council Withheld)
No, neither a Scoutmaster nor anyone else can deliberately
prevent a Scout from advancing, whether rank or merit badge.
However, not permitting a Scout who has severely
misbehaved from participating in a troop activity (in this case,
it happens to be a cycling trip, but it could be anything else
and the same principle would apply) is well within the purview
of a Scoutmaster or other adult leader of a troop. Moreover,
since the Merit Badge Counselor has already suggested a viable
option to this particular troop trip, any argument about your
son being some-how prevented from earning his merit badge would
be on pretty weak ground. As one parent to another, I really
wouldn't recommend pursuing this particular avenue. But I'd
definitely support my son if he opts for the alternate, as
suggested.
Now, there's a much deeper issue here: What's causing all of
these apparent behavioral problems? A troop meeting program
(troop meetings last no more than 90 minutes) is pretty tight
(there are seven essential elements) with very little to no time
for mischief to happen. The Scouts are grouped by and operate
within patrols of 6 to 8, and are led by Patrol Leaders who have
very specific things to do during troop meetings. Moreover,
included in every troop meeting is at least one (often two) game
or competition that helps boys of Scout age blow off some of
their natural energy. Finally, there are Assistant Scoutmasters
who "shadow" brand-new patrols to make sure proper behavior is
maintained. If the troop isn't following these fundamental
guidelines, then there may be more a program problem than a
behavior problem. You see, it's pretty simple: If we don't give
these boys something to do that's interesting, challenging, fun,
and constructive, they'll find something to do all by themselves
and it's unlikely that these four characteristics will be
present (especially the last one)!
Another concern of mine is this: What are the adults doing when
someone like your son is "letting it get out of control until
someone gets hurt"? Understandably, this can happen in a matter
of minutes, or less. But... Is no one seeing this, or
anticipating this, or cutting it off before anyone comes into
harm's way? What's going on here?
I have the strong feeling that the Scoutmaster and several
adults need to have a "study session" for themselves right away,
and the book to study hard is the Scoutmaster Handbook.
Good luck with this and, as a parent, what is keeping you from
disciplining your son, yourself? What's keeping you from reading
him the Riot Act at home, so that he's not getting into this
sort of mischief at troop meetings?
My wife taught middle school kids for over 30 years and she'd
tell you this: Boys (especially boys) of Boy Scout age
are looking for the boundaries. They want to know what the
limits are, and they'll "test" adults to find out. Our
responsibility, as adults, is to let them know, in absolutely
concrete terms, where the boundaries are, and then enforce them
consistently and resolutely. Not by being "ogres" and definitely
not with "patience" if patience means letting them push the
boundaries further and further away from civil and courteous
behavior, but by being more clever (anticipation means you can
prevent instead of react) than they are and by being 100% firm
and 100% consistent.
Dear Andy,
Is it OK for a Merit Badge Counselor to make up a written test
for the merit badge he's teaching? I know it says on the BSA
site that a Counselor can “test” the Scout, and I also know it
says that you can't add to or take away from the requirements.
But I'd think that if the BSA wanted a written test they'd
include one in selected merit badge requirements, so that all
Scouts are treated the same. I've read that Scouts may be
“tested” but I believe the BSA means during the interaction and
discussion between the Scout and the Counselor, and not some
sort of “final exam.” The reason I'm asking is that we have a
Merit Badge Counselor who made up a written test for Camping MB
and because a Scout didn't agree with the test, he left our
troop and joined another one. Can you give us some guidance
here? (Name & Council Withheld)
If the BSA were run like "Scout School," tests would be just
ducky. But that's not what Scouting's all about. The
responsibility of a Merit Badge Counselor is to encourage,
coach, teach, and mentor Scouts to success. The mere notion of
giving “exams” tells me instantly that that MBC just has no clue
as to what he's supposed to be doing, or why. He can go work for
ETS if he likes, but that sort of test-giving behavior simply
has no place in Scouting. If you have anything to do with which
MBCs Scouts are directed to, cross this jerk off the list and
never send him another Scout!
Dear Andy,
We have a Scout father who wants to bring his daughter
(approximately 11 years old) along to summer camp with the
troop. What things do we need to consider when having a girl
in camp? (Name & Council Withheld)
The first thing to consider is that this is a really stoopid
idea. Boy Scout camps are for Boy Scouts. They're not for
sisters, little baby brothers, doting mommies, or wussy
daddies. If the only way you can get "adult coverage" from
this father is by way of his bringing daughter along for the
ride, replace him with another dad. Failing to do this
diminishes the Scouting experience not only for this poor
brother but for every Scout in the troop. End of story.
Dear Andy,
I agree, but there doesn't seem to be anyone else in the
troop who sees this as an issue. (N&CW)
These people must be made to understand that having
"Sis" along for the ride is totally, completely, 100% in
opposition to the Boy Scout outdoor experience. If the
family wants to go family camping that's just fine. But
that's not Boy Scouting, any more than Boy Scouting is all
about having some Scout's sister in camp for a week. Anybody
who can't understand this point needs to be thanked for
their time of service and shown the door. Any Triage unit
would put them in the "hopeless" group and move on to those
who are salvageable.
Dear Andy,
My troop will hold a Court of Honor for six new Eagle
Scouts, and I have a few questions relating to flag ceremony
procedures.
From watching other troops, I've noticed that many of them
didn't have a closing flag ceremony. Is a closing ceremony
absolutely necessary for such an occasion? And if it is,
what is the proper term to call to the color guard (opposite
of "post the colors")?
In the
usscouts.org/macscouter/Eagle/EagleBook
website, I noticed that the term, "retire the colors," was used
during the closing flag ceremony. I've always thought that
retiring colors meant burning the flag at the end of its time of
service. Can you please clarify this term?
I've also noticed, from watching the flag ceremonies during the
governor's inauguration, that the color guard didn't even post
the colors—They marched up to the stage, did the national anthem
and so on, and then marched back with the colors. I'm wondering
if this procedure is correct and if we should use it.
My troop and I would greatly appreciate your answers to improve
our flag ceremony procedures. (Quan Do)
No, don't do what that governor's honor guard did. Although what
they did is perfectly “legal,” you can do better.
"Color Guard, present the colors" is the command from the front,
by the Senior Patrol Leader, signifying that the color guard
(two or four Scouts--your choice) should now advance the
American flag and the troop flag from the rear of the room to
the front, place the flags in their proper stands, and then
stand at attention on either side of the flag they've placed.
Unencumbered, they can salute and repeat the pledge along with
everyone else. Or, they can remain at attention facing the
audience and not salute. Your decision. Then, the command is:
"Color Guard, return to ranks," at which command the Scouts form
up in front of the Senior Patrol Leader, salute (he returns
their salute) and then about-face and take their seats with the
troop.
At the end of the court of honor (or any troop meeting, for that
matter), the command is: "Color Guard, front-and-center." When
they come forward, they stop in front of the Senior Patrol
Leader and salute him. He returns the salute and gives the
command, "Retire the Colors," upon which the color guard goes to
the two flags, removes them from their stands, and then--just
before they march the flags out--the Senior Patrol Leader says
to those assembled: "All please rise." Then, the colors go out.
With the Scouts and parents still standing, the Senior Patrol
Leader makes the Scout Sign and says, "And now, may the great
Master of all Scouts be with us till we meet again. Goodnight."
I've left out turning sharply and cutting corners on turns and
such because you'll rehearse these before the court of honor
anyway!
Happy Scouting!!
Andy
You can write to me about any Scouting-related subject or
concern at:
askandybsa@yahoo.com
(June
1, 2008 – Copyright © Andy McCommish 2008)
Letters to AskAndy may be published at
the discretion of the columnist and the editor. If you
prefer to have your name or affiliation withheld from
publication, please advise in your letter.