|
In
my last column, Laurie Joyce, Group Adviser of the First
Braidwood Scout Group in New South Wales, Australia, asked about
a short movie about a patrol of
Scouts
who get transported back in time to B-P and the siege of
Mafeking. I asked if anyone had ever heard of this and, Lo, a
response! Here it is…
Hi Andy!
I’m thinking maybe
the “movie” Laurie Joyce asked about isn’t actually a movie but
one episode of an old serial… Back in the 30’s, there were two
that I know of: “Young Eagles” and “Scouts to the
Rescue.” I’ll bet that an episode in one of those—I’m
betting on “Scouts to the Rescue,” which had plot lines
like that—is what we’re looking for here! (David
Lloyd Merrill, DC, Gulf Stream Council, FL)
Thanks! Anyone else…?
Hey Andy,
Can you recommend
a system that could help us Scoutmasters know who we can and
can’t release a Scout to?
This summer at
camp, we had a divorced dad show up to pick up his son (a day
early, without early notice), meanwhile, mom is the one who sent
the Scout to camp. Any help would be great! (Rick Jurgens, SM,
Patriots’ Path Council, NJ)
This
may no so much be a need for a "system" or "formal procedure" as
it points up the need to understand your Scouts' family
situations. Let's first agree that a "divorced dad" is still
Dad, just like a "divorced mom" is still Mom. Suppose they
weren't divorced... Nothing wrong with one parent handling the
drop-off and the other handling the pick-up, even if a day
early, right? So this isolates "divorce" as the problematic
area, because you don't know who has custodial rights, right?
Well, the good news is that that's not your problem. If the
parents themselves haven't informed you, so long as you're
releasing a minor to the care of a parent, you've done what you
should do. If the parents are having a problem, this is up to
them to solve. In fact, I'd probably stay away from a "system"
so as to not insinuate the troop's adult leaders into a
situation that, if it gets messy, will get real messy!
That said, remember that I'm not a lawyer, so this doesn't
represent legal advice. I'm doing my best to apply good sense,
but I could be mistaken! Is it worth further checking out?
Depends on how many Scouts in your troop are in this situation,
I suppose. But it’s definitely worth an eyeball-to-eyeball chat
with that particular mom and dad, so that everyone’s on the same
page from now on.
Hey Andy,
Is there a
syllabus for Boy Scout Roundtable Commissioners? (Chuck Porter,
Mississippi Valley Council, IL)
Sure is! If you
want a training syllabus or 12-month program planning guide, ask
your council Scout Shop for them! They're pretty inexpensive!
Dear Andy,
My question’s a bit of a twist on the "can a boy earn Eagle too
quickly" issue. An older boy—he’s 16—just joined our troop. He’s
very excited about earning Eagle rank and very motivated to make
it. He went from not being able to swim a stroke to being able
to pass the First Class BSA swimmer test in about a month. The
troop wants to help him as much as we can; however, I'm worried
about some of the time requirements. As I read the requirements,
he'll have to be First Class four months before his 17th
birthday and then Star right on that date, or sooner. Right
now, he’s only about two-and-a-half weeks away from the First
Class deadline, and still has many requirements to finish up.
Our Chartered Organization head and representative are also
interested in helping this young man, and they’re asking me: If
he misses one of these timing deadlines by, let’s say, a few
weeks, can he still get his Eagle? I’ve told them that I
understood the time requirements to be unchangeable… Am I
correct on that?
I'm trying to let
this young man know that Eagle is a great goal, but even making
it to Life, Star, or First Class is a tremendous accomplishment
for anyone, especially someone starting when he’s over 16!
Please let me know your thoughts. (Scott Mehr, SM, Middle
Tennessee Council)
Very rare are the
exceptions to a Scout's 18th birthday made by the BSA National
Council, and almost always relate to either a severe and
well-documented disability or a circumstance well beyond the
Scout's ability to control (e.g., long hospitalization, or
something akin). If I had to guess, joining late wouldn’t be
among the considerations given latitude in this area.
This young man's
goal is commendable, and I'm hoping he extends every effort to
complete his First Class requirements so that he can have his
board of review several days before his 17th birthday (he's
going to need a few "cushion days" if at all possible. As with
all Boy Scout advancement, this is pretty much up to him. He’ll
definitely need to "hit the numbers" for tenure-in-rank, and the
best support the troop can give him is to prepare for his boards
of review well in advance, so that they happen right on schedule
with no unfortunately delays. His board of review for Eagle,
however, can take place after his 18th birthday, but his Life
rank review must absolutely be at least six months before that
birthday—even a day missing can cost him his tenure requirement.
(For a perspective on the 98 Scouts in a hundred who aren’t
Eagles, please read my November 2002 column-Issue No. 6.)
Dear Andy,
I’ve been serving as an adult leader in a troop and have just
received an ID card that says I’m a committee member. What
exactly does that mean? I usually attend functions as an
additional pair of eyes-and-ears and help out whenever needed or
as assigned by the Scoutmaster.
I was a Cub Scout as a kid but want to be more involved with my
son now. Should I get a Class A uniform with a committee patch
on it? (Travis, Tri-State Area Council, WV/OH/KY)
Your
question's a good one and there are two ways to get the best
answer possible... Get yourself a copy of the Scoutmaster
Handbook or Troop Committee Guidebook and do a little
reading, or—better yet—sign up for training in your specific
position! That said, you may need to re-think your situation,
and change your registration. Talk to the Scoutmaster about
changing over from committee member to Assistant Scoutmaster.
Boy Scouting, you also need to keep in mind, isn’t about
"getting involved with your son." This is his
adventure; it's not a "Dad n' Lad" adventure. You can observe
from a distance, but this ain't Cub Scouts or Indian Guides, and
parent-to-son "bonding" isn't what Boy Scouts is about! Share
memories and compare notes about campouts and such, but don’t
share the tent!
Dear Andy,
Where do you wear
Palms on your uniform? (Lisa Oatman)
Palms aren’t worn
on the uniform of a Boy Scout; they're pinned to the ribbon of
his Eagle medal, which is worn at courts of honor and other
special ceremonial occasions and events.
Hi Andy,
I’ve
gotten mixed answers but can’t find anything definite: Is it
true that a Scout can do no more than three merit badges with
any one counselor? (Lara Reibold)
No,
that's not true. Whoever told you that is mistaken. It is, in
fact, a BSA policy that a Scout can earn an unlimited number of
merit badges from the same registered Merit Badge Counselor.
(Next time you get two different answers to the same question,
or something that just doesn’t seem to ring true, you have every
right to ask to see it in writing by the BSA.)
Dear
Andy,
I’m having an
issue in our troop about Scouts working on merit badges, and I
hope you can give me some advice…
In my Scoutmaster
training, a question was raised about being a Merit Badge
Counselor for your own son. It was clarified to me in training
that you can sign on your own son's merit badge requirements;
however, BSA guidelines suggest that your son have a buddy take
the merit badge with him.
My son worked for
nearly two years on various merit badges. The only ones he was
able to finish were those offered at a “merit badge college.”
He asked his troop, he asked his buddies, but either he picked
merit badges that most of the Scouts already had, or he picked
ones that they weren’t interested in (even though he was). So,
he wound up with a bunch of “partials” that just sat around
because he couldn’t get a buddy to work with him.
So, after
waiting and waiting, I went ahead and on his merit badges with
him—as a counselor—being sure to photo-document everything he
did, so no one could suggest we were just "pencil-whipping"
the requirements.
But, when he
turned in his signed-off Blue Cards, he was told that his troop
wouldn’t recognize those merit badges because he didn’t work
with a buddy. When I inquired about this supposed stipulation,
the troop’s advancement chair at first said it was a BSA policy,
but when he produced “hard copy” to quote the policy, it turned
out that it wasn’t a policy after all, so the story was changed
to it being a “troop policy” that you had to have a buddy. I
counter-argued that doing this constituted changing a national
policy—essentially, they were adding to each merit badge a
requirement that "you must work on this with a buddy."
Even when this
situation was taken to an extreme, to whit, my son was diagnosed
with cancer and had to be in complete isolation (giving him lots
of time to work on the less physically-oriented merit badges),
he was told that his work wouldn’t be honored unless he worked
with a buddy, even though he couldn’t leave the hospital and was
not permitted visitors in his room.
So, can you please
clarify this situation? I do think that Scouts should try to
work with others on their merit badges, as group dynamics and
communication is a life-skill, but when the situation just
doesn’t work out, or no one else is interested in Nuclear
Science, a boy shouldn’t be forced to forego earning that merit
badge, and credit should be given if he takes the initiative and
works on it even if alone. (Stewart “Sarge” Morrison, MBC,
Circle 10 Council, TX)
I'm going to
assume that you're not only a registered Merit Badge Counselor,
but you're also listed for the ones you counseled your son on.
That being the case, it’s plain that your son’s troop needs some
reeducation:
"Buddy"
The BSA is very specific as to who may be a buddy for a Scout
wishing to earn a merit badge—It may be any one of these three:
Another Scout, a relative (e.g., parent, aunt or uncle, brother,
cousin), or a friend (neighbor, classmate, etc.). This is so
stated on page 187 of the Boy Scout Handbook. This is
further stated in any edition of the Boy Scout Requirements
books (in the current edition, it's on page 22): "Scout Buddy
System...This person can be another Scout, your parents or
guardian, a brother or sister, a relative, or a friend."
Parent-as-Counselor
Advancement Committee Policies and Procedures
(No.33088C), page 13, contains this statement: An approved Merit
Badge Counselor may counsel any youth member, including his or
her own son, ward, or relative."
Number of Same-Counselor Merit Badges (this one's "just in
case...")
On the same page as noted immediately above, this statement:
"There is no limit on the number of merit badges a youth may
earn from one counselor."
Superseding BSA National Policy
No individual, unit, district, or council may establish a policy
that supersedes BSA national policy.
The unhappy conclusion to be drawn is that this troop, while
possibly trying to be well-meaning, is totally incorrect in its
understanding of both what a merit badge buddy is and as regards
setting itself above the National Council of the Boy Scouts of
America.
Because of these misunderstandings of BSA policy, this troop has
done your son any number of disservices, both now and in the
past. It would behoove the adult volunteers of that troop to
not only offer your son an apology, but also to apologize to
every other Scout who has been stymied by arbitrary "rules" set
in place by ill-informed adults who have failed in their
responsibility for knowing these aspects of the program they're
supposed to be delivering.
Thanks—I appreciate the clarification. Do you have time for
another?
Does the BSA have
a policy on what constitutes "service hours" for rank
requirements? I’m asking because our Scoutmaster has said that
only hours earned at Eagle projects (i.e., helping another Scout
with his Eagle project) and at troop cleanups (our troop has
“adopted” a creek that we clean up quarterly) can be used toward
rank requirement. This “troop policy” has discouraged a lot of
Scouts who have volunteered their time at Cub Scout and Webelos
camps and church camps like Vacation Bible School, and other
Scouts as well, who have worked on city emergency preparation
projects and even fundraising and volunteer work for local
charities, and who are now being told none of these hours spent
in service to the community can be counted toward their next
ranks. Now the rank requirement does say that the service must
be approved by the Scoutmaster, but this seems different from
the kind of limit that’s being put on service, with no
exceptions permitted.
I’ve been looking
for some clarification on this. Can you help me out again? (Sarge)
I always
have time! That's what I've been here for, for the past seven
years!
The best definition of what the BSA National Council considers
service appropriate for approval by a Scoutmaster is right on
page 88 of...you guessed it...the Boy Scout Handbook.
Here's an excerpt (you can read it in its entirety by borrowing
your son's handbook): "Service...can take many forms—community
cleanup; repairing a church, a museum, or the home of an elderly
person; improving wildlife habitat; volunteering at a hospital
or with a public safety group; organizing a recycling effort;
cleaning up a neighborhood lot or park; or any of a thousand
other possibilities." Nowhere does the BSA stipulate
that service hours must be only Eagle projects; moreover, only
the Eagle project stipulates that this may not be for the BSA or
Scouting—therefore, volunteering at a Cub Scout day camp is
absolutely appropriate for all Scouts except Eagle candidates.
Once again, the erstwhile adults supposedly responsible for this
troop have it wrong. As a result, they are damaging the
Scouting experience for the youth they are supposed to be
serving. At this point, I'm obliged to say shame on them.
If they’re not willing to openly apologize to the Scouts for
their stultifying mistakes, and correct their errors, get your
son and every one of his friends out of that troop immediately,
and help get them into a troop that's delivering the Scouting
program as written.
To give you some background, the troop’s leaders (the adults,
that is) got worried because we had a huge decline in Scouts
attending the creek cleanups and Eagle projects; however, I
think that maybe adding an incentive to participate in these
areas would be better than refusing to recognize any other
service project type. And we did have a father-and-son working
on merit badges a while back, and it was determined that they
had “pencil-whipped” more than half of the badges instead of the
Scout earning them correctly—that’s how that policy of having a
buddy when counseling your own son got put into effect. So
although I can see where they’ve come from with this, I think
they’re taking the wrong direction and setting the wrong example
for the Scouts. (Sarge)
In the first
place, Scouts aren't the only helps an Eagle candidate can have
for his project, and it's not up to the troop to recruit a
candidate's helpers, anyway—that's part of the candidate's job,
and he can recruit friends, classmates, neighbors, anyone he
wants. (I knew an Eagle candidate who recruited the entire
girls' cheer-leading squad from his high school as his
helpers!) On troop service projects, this is for the Patrol
Leaders Council to decide, so that the Scouts have an "emotional
investment" in the project. Without this, who gives a rat's
you-know-what!?!?
As for "pencil-whipping" merit badges, the troop isn't the
watchdog; the district and council advancement committees are
responsible for the quality of merit badge counseling. Besides,
the only "loser" in a situation where the merit badge is a gimme
is the Scout himself (he got short-changed)—no one else. So,
regardless of rationale, justifiable or not, a troop simply
can't enforce its own rules in a way that supersedes national
policies.
Dear Andy,
Can the service
hour requirement for Citizenship in the Community merit badge
count toward rank advancement service hours? In looking for
the answer to this, I read some of your earlier Q&A’s and I’m
confused on the merit badges needed for Eagle Palms. In my
son’s handbook, there are only five spaces to write in each of
the additional merit badges for the respective Eagle Palm. It
also states "Earn five additional merit badges beyond those
required for the Eagle rank." On the others, Eagle is replaced
by “Silver Palm” and “Gold Palm.” (Sandy Scharpenberg)
On your first
question, take a look at how Cit-Community's req. 7(c) is
stated: "With your counselor's and your parent's approval..."
Now, take a look at how Second Class req. 4, Star req. 4, and
Life req. 4 are stated: "Participate in an
approved.../...approved by your Scoutmaster." Notice that the
merit badge service and the rank service are approved by
different people? This tells us that the Boy Scouts has
different service projects and time in mind. So, it’s a
reasonable conclusion that one isn't a substitute for the other.
About your Eagle Palms confusion... Notice that there are three
Palms: Bronze, for the first 5 merit badges you earn after the
21 needed for Eagle (total=26); Gold, for the second group of 5
merit badges you earn after the 21 for Eagle and the 5 for the
Bronze Palm (total=31); and then Silver, for the 5 merit badges
you earn after the 21 for Eagle and the 10 for the first two
Palms (total=36). After the Silver Palm, if you earn 5 more
(total=41), you get to wear both a Bronze and a Silver Palm, and
then earn 5 more and you get to wear a Gold and a Silver Palm,
and so on. Got it? OK!
Hello Andy,
It states in the
Emergency Preparedness merit badge book, "1. Earn the First Aid
merit badge." The question is: Can a Scout work on this and
the First Aid merit badge at the same time at camp? (In looking
at the requirements for Emergency Preparedness, it doesn't seem
there’s much that requires the knowledge from First Aid merit
badge in order to learn the Emergency Preparedness material.)
(Bob Geiser, ASM, Golden Empire Council, CA)
Sure he can! So
long as he completes First Aid and can show his signed-off "Blue
Card" to his counselor for Emergency Preparedness, it's a done
deal!
Hi Andy,
My husband and I
have just been asked to be the Scout leaders for the troop at
our church. We’re happy to do this—we’ve raised three sons
successfully—but we’re really clueless about what we need to do
and where to start. We have one boy in our group right now and
are expecting two more in the next couple weeks. The one boy
that we have has already worked his way through the majority of
the First Class requirements and will be starting on his Star
requirements shortly. I have a Boy Scout Handbook and
that’s it. (Karen Meyer)
I don't know how
big a town you’re in or how big a church... are you in a stake
or a branch? At any rate, do have a conversation with the
bishop who called you in the first place or, in his absence,
your stake president. Let him know that you're interested and
willing to run the Scouting program according to Hoyle, but
you're going to need some backup till you get your legs under
you. Maybe there's a previous Scoutmaster or other troop
volunteers who can help you out for a while? Or, maybe there's
someone at the district level of the local council (a district
is a geographic sub-area of a council, that provides direct
service to all Scouting units) who can help—ask for a Unit
Commissioner who has experience with smaller troops to be
assigned to you. Next, find out what the council's training
schedule is, and get yourselves signed up! This will be the
most valuable and important thing you can do! While you're
waiting for your training dates, get yourselves a copy of the
Scoutmaster Handbook. You don't have to read it in
page-order... Read the front-end, and then pick and choose.
Read up on advancement, so you know what your Scouts are doing,
then keep going! That should get you started... Take care of
these items, and then write to me again. Let me know what you've
been able to accomplish, and then we'll take a look at what else
you can do to make this work!
Dear Andy,
I’m a Scoutmaster with a "situation." Here’s the scenario…
A 16 year old Life
Scout who holds the Quartermaster position, attends only about
three or four troop meetings over a year period and doesn’t go
on any campouts or extra-meeting activities except once, for a
one-night "lock-in"—basically, he put Scouts “on hold”—has
reappeared for a couple of meetings, completed his merit badges,
done his Eagle project, and now wants his Scoutmaster’s
Conference, since he’s completed all other requirements for
Eagle.
Oh, by the way, back when we did his Life rank Scoutmaster
Conference, I asked him to show more leadership skills for an
additional three months before I signed him off. (Previously,
his attitude and language weren’t Scout-like and he picked on
other Scouts, leading some to leave the troop and Scouting). He
was counseled on those things.) As a result, he was stellar for
three months and got his Life. But soon after that he stopped
coming to meetings, until just recently. He’s told people
(myself included) that he won’t be asking any of the leaders for
a reference and some of the more veteran leaders have said he’s
“not Eagle-worthy.” His parents really want him to be an Eagle
Scout, and he does too, since he may apply to a service academy
and it would look good on his resume. Several issues such as
leadership, being active, and even legalities are in question.
Also, the younger Scouts are watching the situation, too. Your
advice? (Joe Johnson)
Let's start with
the Scoutmaster's Conference for Life. It happened, it's done
and passed. Can't re-live it. Can't use it as a torpedo to
sink this Scout's ship now. It's water under the bridge.
Then, for his next three to four months, he was a "model
Scout." But somebody let him slip away, back into his "old
habits," perhaps. Was that his Scoutmaster? Maybe. Because
Scouts don't conference with their Scoutmasters only when it's
time for rank advancement. The conferencing process is
continuous and continual. Conferences can last up to 15
minutes, but sometimes just a couple of minutes is all that's
needed. They don't have to be at troop meetings, either.
There's nothing wrong with the phone, to say, "Hey, we need to
yak a bit... Come on to the next troop meeting so we can get
together for a little while." Then there's also the Assistant
Scoutmaster (or Scoutmaster if there's no Assistant) to whom the
Quartermaster reports and works with... What happened to him?
What happened to the mentoring and guidance this Scout’s
supposed to be given on an ongoing basis? Can't use "well, the
Scout didn't show up" as an excuse for not reaching out to him
and keeping him actively involved in the running of the troop!
You see, what
you’re telling me here, also, is that, for an entire year,
nobody in the troop ever reached out to this young man, either.
What others might think of his “worthiness” is, of course,
irrelevant. If this young man has duly completed the
requirements for a rank, then he’s earned that rank. The
purpose of the Scoutmaster's Conference is to prepare the Scout
for his board of review; it’s not for the Scoutmaster to be "the
gatekeeper's last resort."
As for “the legalities" of his eligibility for rank advancement,
I’m assuming you're referring to the consideration of "active."
The long and short of it is that so long as this Scout is duly
registered as a dues-paid member of the troop, he’s considered
active. (Don't try to use this as a way to defer sending this
Scout to his board of review, and the board of review cannot
"ding" this Scout on the basis of whether or not they happen to
consider him active—If this should happen, the Scout has the
right to appeal the decision, and that appeal will succeed.)
As for references, whatever names he lists on his Eagle
application should be adhered to, and should be invited to
comment by a totally neutral party, in my estimation, lest there
be unintended backwash or innuendo.
All of the forgoing not withstanding, you and your troop's adult
leaders, and the members of his board of review, have the
absolute right (if not actual obligation) to ask this young man
about "Life after Eagle"! In other words, what are his plans
and goals, as a potential Eagle Scout, to contribute to his
troop and his fellow Scouts after he's an Eagle Scout? On this,
you have every right to expect specifics from him, such as, "I'd
like to be our troop's next Senior Patrol Leader," or, "As a
Junior Assistant Scoutmaster, I'd like to take on the special
assignment of..." Now you can't demand that he do this, but you
can certainly alert him, in your Scoutmaster's Conference, that
the board of review will be listening carefully to what he says
here in order to assess whether or not he's truly "Eagle
material in spirit and commitment." (Are you getting my drift
here...?)
The other question to ask, of course, is "On a scale of 1 to 10,
10 being a definite yes and 1 being a definite no, what number
best describes how well you're living by the Scout Oath and Law
in your daily life?" If the number's less than, say, 7, you
might want to ask him what he's going to do in the next 30 days,
60 days, whatever, to change that number to a 9 or 10. Then,
stick with him closely, so that he succeeds, because our “job”
is to help young men like this succeed.
Dear Andy,
My son will be
staying out-of-state for most of the summer, but he’ll be
connected with a troop while he’s staying there. Can he have his
Scoutmaster Conference and board of review for his next rank
with that troop instead of his “home troop”?
I have a copy of
his individual progress report and his history, showing that all
he needs signed off are Scout spirit and Scoutmaster Conference,
then he’ll be ready for his board of review. At his last meeting
with our home troop before he left, he was busy getting a Blue
Card signed off by the counselor, and getting the ones he wanted
to work on while away signed by the Scoutmaster. He wants to get
this rank finished so that he can get working on the next one.
I’ll check with his home Scoutmaster and make sure he’s OK with
this first (I don't want to step on his toes), if you say it can
be done. (Tricia Barber, Longhorn Council)
I’m guessing
you're talking about Star rank. First, this is definitely not
for you to do—this is for your son to do. This is
how boys grown into young men—by taking responsibility for their
own destiny. If he's away already, he can call his home
Scoutmaster and describe the situation. His Scoutmaster just
might be willing to do a conference over the phone, and the
board of review might be done over the phone, as well. But this
is between your son and his Scoutmaster, and the troop
committee. If the answer's no, it's not the end of the world.
At the most, your son will "lose" maybe a month to a
month-and-a-half of possible "tenure in rank," and this
certainly isn't horrible. Meanwhile, he can start earning the
merit badges he'll need for Life! Trust me, please… Let your
son grow up a little more when he does this for himself! (It’s
tough to not do this yourself, but it’s worth it!)
Hello USSSP and Andy,
I have a uniform question that, even after much research, I
can’t find an answer to. I hope you can help!
I have been told two different answers regarding Cub
Scouts saluting the flag during the
Pledge of Allegiance. I know
that if a Cub Scout is not in uniform, he places his hand over
his heart while saying the Pledge.
What about a boy who’s in full uniform, except for his
hat? A fellow Scouter said that as long as he’s either wearing
the hat alone or the rest of the uniform (everything complete
except hat), that he may salute, but the other Scouter said that
the boy must be in full uniform, including his hat, in
order to salute.
The confusion came about during a flag ceremony at school. All
the Cubs were asked to come in
uniform, except for hats, due to school policy. Half thought
they should salute; he other half thought they shouldn’t.
Please clear up this puzzle so I can teach the Cub Scouts and
leaders the appropriate rules. (Holly Ciani, CM)
First, here’s what out Netcommish had to say…
You have a question that I’m sure is asked often in Cub
Scouting. Whether or not a person salutes the U.S. Flag is
determined by the words in the federal law—sometimes called the
U.S. Flag Code at 2 U.S.C. 172. The code specifies:
"The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, 'I pledge allegiance to
the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic
for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with
liberty and justice for all.', should be rendered by standing at
attention facing the flag with
the right hand over the heart. When not in uniform men should
remove their headdress with their right hand and hold it at the
left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. Persons in uniform
should remain silent, face the flag,
and render the military salute."
In Scouting, we’ve historically interpreted the "should" in
“should remain silent” as a recommendation; not an absolute.
Scouts not in the color guard
generally will recite the pledge. Whether or not the color
guard does so varies from place to place in practice.
The only thing the law says is "Persons in uniform" with respect
to uniforming. It does not say military uniform, Boy Scout
uniform, etc. or "complete uniform." Had Congress intended to
say "complete uniform" it could easily have done so, but it did
not. Similarly, Congress did not define what constitutes a
uniform.
Generally, I think we should encourage complete uniforms as a
Scouting method, but as to saluting the colors, it seems to me
that the important thing is to encourage citizenship through
participating in the salute and learning respect. If I had a
pack or troop of poor Scouts who could only afford a hat and
neckerchief, I would have them salute because the act of
participation instills citizenship values.
My own commentary is…
I've developed a different approach to stuff like this—It's come
about because I'm becoming an impatient curmudgeon when it comes
to Scouters spouting off to other Scouters about "stuff" they
purport to be ultimate gospel when for all we know they could be
absolutely clueless. So, when we hear something that conflicts
with either good sense (not "common" sense), or what we've known
to be that way pretty much forever, or what we've actually read
about in BSA literature, then instead of getting all confused or
befuddled, and instead of either digging in to prove or disprove
what was said, or trying to get someone else to do our work for
us, here's what we do: We say to the person who has just
expressed his or her infinite knowledge of all things Scouting
and shared it from the bottom of their pea-pickin' li'l heart:
"Oh, really? That's sort of interesting. What's your source?
Say, why don't you show that to me in BSA literature or some
other authoritative writing, so I can see it for myself. Oh?
You can't/won't/whatever? Well, then I think I'll just keep on
keepin' on, and thank you for your time."
I've also grown weary of the "I've been told...Blah, blah, blah"
routine, without identification of the "authority" who did the
original blabbin' --
As to the actual question, let’s spin it even further… Suppose
there’s a slight dent in the hat: Would this constitute a
“non-hat”? Or what if a boy’s socks aren’t “official” socks…
does he not salute? Can we possibly get more petty?
Here’s the real deal: SALUTE! This is the American Flag, and
we’re American Scouts—the backbone of the country. End of
story.
Dear Andy,
As a District
Commissioner, I’ve been asked about conduct
policies—specifically, are conduct policies or a code of conduct
established and adopted by unit leadership a violation of BSA
policy?
I’ve found that
many units have a code of conduct or conduct policy of some
type. I have a unit that’s looking to put a policy in place to
deal in a consistent way with some issues they’re having, and to
let the boys and more importantly their parents know how the
unit will go about dealing with disciplinary problems that may
arise. There’s one leader who vehemently opposes any such
policy and is making many seemingly outlandish claims,
including: It's a violation of BSA policy, it nullifies and
voids BSA insurance, it represents a contract which opens up the
unit and BSA to law suits, it cripples the ability of unit
leaders to deal with disciplinary problems creatively, it
undermines the Scout Oath and Law, it will drive Scouts out of
the unit and out of Scouting, no one else is doing this.
I’m relatively new
to my position, and this issue was never addressed in my
training. I can't seem to find any policy statement from BSA on
this subject. I want to give people accurate facts, so they can
make a good and informed decision. Could you please help me
out. (John Heimann, DC, Daniel Webster Council, NH)
This is one
excellent question, and here's the good news: The BSA has
already written all the policies, procedures, rules,
regulations, and bylaws that any unit could ever possibly need,
and so there’s absolutely no purpose in developing more of these
by any unit, for any reason. If these good people simply turn
to Chapter 11 of the Scoutmaster Handbook, and re-read it, and
then follow it, all of their concerns should evaporate.
I recall the Scoutmaster of a parallel Jamboree troop, some
years back, who issued edict after edict, including the
"disciplinary action" that would occur for each type of
"infraction" and "incident." The Scouts loved it! They loved
it because they immediately set about doing stuff he hadn't
though of, and when he tried to "apply discipline," their retort
was, "You didn't say we couldn't do that!" and he was totally
flummoxed! We in our troop watched him tear his hair out for a
couple of days, and then wandered over, sat down and chatted
with him. We convinced him to simply announce to his troop, "The
only 'rules' for the rest of the Jamboree with be these: Follow
the Scout Oath and Law." All of his supposed "discipline
problems" immediately evaporated and the troop was just fine
from then on.
Ever heard the story about the new Scoutmaster who met an old
Scoutmaster at a crossroads? "Where ya goin'?" asked the old
Scoutmaster. "I'm gonna meet up with my new troop," the new
Scoutmaster said, "But I'm a bit confused on which path to
take... I'm told that if I go one way I'm gonna find a troop of
wonderful, cooperative, happy Scouts, and if I go the other way
I'm gonna run into a troop full o' scalawags, nuisances,
trouble-makers, and heck-raisers, and I'm not sure which way is
which!" To which the old Scoutmaster responded, "Whichever way
you go, you'll find what you expect."
Hello Andy!
I’ve always understood patch location rules
to be the same no matter the gender inside the uniform (more
precisely, I'd never considered that they would be different for
any reason). Two of our female Commissioners proudly wear their
National Camping School insignia above the Boy Scouts of America
strip that’s above their right pocket. I've not said anything
about this until recently, as while I’m a big "proper uniforming"
guy, I am also not “the patch police,” and if Scouters are
well-uniformed and have fun wearing what I’d call "reasonably
placed" patches, I'm not going to be a curmudgeon. However,
since we've got the new uniform coming out, I wanted to share
with everyone some of the finer points of rules, so I boldly
mentioned that, despite what the NCS folks might have told them,
that patch doesn’t belong over the right pocket, but should be
in the “temporary” location on the right pocket. Later, I came
upon the following policy regarding temporary patches for women,
which tells me that I have erred, and that there is a
different placement for temporary insignia on women’s
uniforms—they don’t go on the right pocket at all, but actually
above the pocket. Here’s the excerpt,
straight from the
scouting.org website: “Temporary
Insignia:
Female leaders wearing either the traditional yellow
Cub Scout leader
blouse, the optional tan leader blouse, or the Venturing blouse,
may wear one temporary insignia centered above the Boy Scouts of
America strip.”
I also note that this is supported by the Adult Uniform
Inspection form as well, and that I've missed it this entire
time! So in addition to needing to letting our distaff
Commissioners know I was wrong and they've got it spot-on
correct, I thought I'd share this hyper hair-splitting hallmark
of hilarity with you and, if you deem it worthy of note, your
readers. (David Lloyd Merrill, DC, Gulf Stream Council, FL)
Yup, you got it right... And I agree with you on hair-splitting,
especially since there are many women who staff National
Jamborees, and now what do they do with their Jamboree patches?
Oh the wonderful webs we weave, as if this were the most
important topic of the day. Say, what about female Venturers
who aren't adult leaders—where do they wear their temporary
patches? Whenever you open a can of worms, it always takes a
larger can to get 'em all back in!
But, this stuff aside, my Commissioner cap’s off to you for one
thing in particular: One of the most important qualities of a
Commissioner is his or her ability to fess up when a mistake’s
been made!
Dear Andy,
I while back, we
discussed the issue of one of our Scouts wearing an old Boy
Scout “garrison cap” with the current uniform and how our
troop’s Committee Chair was giving him a hard time about this.
Well, I talked to the Committee Chair and told him about your
reply—How you said that, according to the BSA, any uniform part
of any age is considered “official.” He still doesn't believe
me that it’s OK to mix the old with the current uniform, so I’m
wondering if you can point me to where I can find this policy in
writing, or who I’d contact, so that the Committee Chair would
stop telling this Scout that he can’t wear this hat. (Amy Bosma)
It's time to fight
fire with water. Let's turn the tables on this
stick-in-the-mud: Insist that he shows you where
the BSA says you can’t do this! And, until he does, the
Scout wears what he wants. If he refuses to "cooperate," he's
just lost all credibility, because in Scouting, it's not a game
of "because I say so." Then, but only after you've presented
your challenge, suggest that he call the local Scout shop. Duh!
Thanks,
I’ll try that. Funny about contacting the Scout shop, because I
just had a conversation about when the new uniform shirts are
coming out, so we’ll effectively be mixing and matching old and
new uniform parts anyway! I don't get what he’s trying to
prove, but I intend to get this guy off this Scout’s back! (Amy
Bosma)
Talk about
clueless when it comes to boys and what turns 'em on—and off!
The guy's breathtaking!
Dear Andy,
I'm the
Advancement Chair for our troop and I've been asked to find a
Merit Badge Counselor for Rifle Shooting. My candidate is a
state-registered Certified Firearms Instructor and teaches the
state-mandated gun safety classes for hunting licenses. But
here's the problem: The MBC requirements say he must be
NRA-certified. Wouldn't a certification by the state supersede
the NRA? (Bob Shepard, Narragansett
Council, RI)
Let the council
advancement chair/committee solve that one—that's their job! Ask
your candidate to fill out the paperwork and submit it to your
council service center. I’m gonna bet you dollars to donuts
right now he gets approved!
Hi Andy,
My son’s a life
Scout and was just elected to the OA this past year. Our OA
lodge offers three ways to take the Ordeal: at the Spring
Fellowship, at the Fall Fellowship, or at summer camp during one
of the weeks that its being offered. Here's the problem: My son
is working on camp staff at another council, in another state!
He missed the Ordeal at the Spring Fellowship because it
coincided with his first day of work. Then, he's also going to
Philmont after his camp staff job wraps up, and will miss the
Fall Fellowship. But the camp he works at offers an Ordeal
every week, and his camp staff supervisor has given his OK to do
this. What I'm wondering about is if the OA has a national
policy that Ordeals need to be taken in the home lodge. Any
ideas? (Jeff Kotz, ASM, Blackhawk Area Council, IL)
There's no "national policy" like that that I've ever heard of,
so if your son has permission, and the option to do this, he
should definitely go for it, because there is a national
policy that says if he doesn't do his Ordeal within one year of
the troop election, he's forfeit and has to stand for election
all over again. However, it would also not only be the proper
courtesy but also in the Spirit of Scouting for him to have his
own conversation about this with the chief of his home lodge.
Happy Scouting!
Send your
questions and comments to:
AskAndyBSA@Yahoo.Com
(August
3, 2008 – Copyright © Andy McCommish 2008)
Letters to AskAndy may be published at
the discretion of the columnist and the editor. If you
prefer to have your name or affiliation withheld from
publication, please advise in your letter.
|