Ask Andy - Mid-March 2004
Want to add my “Ask Andy” column to
your council’s website? Easy! Just check with your scout executive and
webmaster first, then have one other the other of them send me an email
requesting the full column twice a month, as I complete them, and giving
me the name and email address to send them to, and you’re in business!
Andy
Remember Tom Lake, the Cubmaster
with a Webelos Crossover Ceremony about to happen and some parents
trying to shove down his throat the notion that all boys should
“cross the bridge” even if they weren’t joining a Boy Scout Troop.
I recommended he stand firm and not let this happen. Here’s an
update from Tom, and here’s what happened:
Hi Andy,
Well, the Blue & Gold Banquet is
now over and I held fast to having only the Webelos Scouts cross
over who were actually joining Boy Scouts. Turns out, even the son
of the Mom-Pack Chair who thought all should cross, no matter what,
decided that he wanted to go on to Boy Scouts after all! My wife is
the Den Leader for the graduating Webelos Scouts, and out of twelve,
ten joined Boy Scouts! Plus, we think one of the two remaining might
yet join. I’ve “retired” from Cubmaster, and now I’m going to help
the Troop our own son joined. Thanks for your help! (Tom Lake)
I couldn't be happier! For you,
unquestionably. But, even more, for the brand-new Boy Scouts and
their parents! And, the best way to loop in those last two is to
have the boys who have just joined the Troop call up the two
straggles and invite them to a Troop meeting—then be their "buddy"
at the meeting!
I'm happy for you that you
chose—correctly—to stand your ground. Look what good came out of
that! And, you leave a legacy of correctness for the next
generation of leadership in the Pack. I hope you've made the time
to get your replacement trained, and that you move on gracefully.
Very best wishes to you and your
new Boy Scout son—you're about to have some truly magical years!
Meanwhile, here’s another
viewpoint about what I said to Tom...
Hi Andy,
I don't agree with
your advice to Tom Lake in January 2004 about Webelos crossovers and
“holding back.” I’ve been at cross-overs as a Scoutmaster and in my
capacity as Unit Commissioner, too. I always carry extra red
shoulder loops, in case there’s a Webelos Scout who’s undecided on
the Troop to join. Just last weekend, I crossed two undecided boys
into Scouting—They talked at length with some of the Scouts from the
Troops who came to accept new Scouts, and by the end of the
afternoon, one lad had made up his mind on where he wanted to go. I
find that sometimes family situations also play a role. We have
military families in our area, and sometimes parents' jobs require
them to move, too. I’ve often seen youth who are waiting to join a
different Troop because they’re in the process of moving and haven't
yet had an opportunity to find a Troop in their new locale. These
youth have every intention of being a Loyal Scout, but sometimes the
situation requires that they have a few months’ gap between the
planned cross-over ceremony at the Blue & Gold and joining a Troop.
I don't believe that we’re being fair to these youth if we don't
cross them into Boy Scouting. I’ve found that many of these
undecided boys will eventually join a Troop and be successful. I
have several of them in my own Troop! Please rethink your answer.
(Deb McCormick, SM-Troop 472, UC, Clinton Valley Council, MI)
My answer, for the
situation you refer to, stands pat. Why? Because in Tom Lake’s
situation, we weren’t dealing with Webelos Scouts who wanted to join
Boy Scouts but were "undecided" as to the specific Troop. Instead,
this was a situation of boys who were specifically NOT going on to
Boy Scouting, and a Cubmaster who was being railroaded into having
them "cross-over" to nowhere by parents who didn't want their sons
"left out" even though they were henceforth leaving Scouting out of
their lives.
But, since you've
raised some different sorts of situations than the one we recently
managed—and quite successfully, too, according to Tom—I'll go on
with a few more thoughts...
In a situation of
moving, I couldn't agree more that a Webelos Scout who intends to
join a Troop as soon as the family's move is completed should
definitely "cross over." This not only affirms his decision but
reinforces his intentions.
In a situation of
earning the Arrow of Light award and still being "undecided" as to
Troop, this has to be extremely rare if the AoL requirements of (1)
visiting a Troop meeting with the Den; (2) visiting a Boy
Scout-oriented outdoor activity; and (3) visiting a Troop he'd
consider joining, with his parent(s), having a conference with the
Scoutmaster, and filling out the paperwork to join are all met. In
fact, the boy and his family would quite literally have to "walk
away" from these visits and paperwork commitment in order to wind up
"undecided"! So, what we Commissioners need to do (check out the
Commissioner Training session on the "Webelos-to-Scout Transition")
is to assure that the transition occurs.
Deb writes back...
Thanks for your
reply, Andy. I do agree that if a youth is adamant about not going
to go on to Boy Scouts, then the crossover is nothing more than an
empty ritual. Unfortunately, there are Webelos Leaders out there who
only bring their boys to the bare minimum number of Troop visits
(just to get them out of the way). I live in the suburbs of Detroit
and there are a large number of Troops in our area. Therefore,
unless the parent has done research and made an effort, they may not
be happy with the Troop that was visited by the Webelos Den where
the boys were told to turn in their application. I do my best to
reach as many youth (and parents) as I can, and make sure they
understand their options. I encourage all the boys who join my Troop
to look at other Troops before turning in their paperwork to me. I
believe I have the best Troop out there, but I want the boys and the
parents to know what the options are first—This way they know that
our Troop is the right one for them. I guess my main point is that
once the boy has those red loops on his shoulders, it makes him
"feel" like a Scout, and sometimes that's all he needs to change his
mind about joining Boy Scouting. I know that sometimes boys are
crossed over into many Troops in our area and the boys decide
(usually after that March campout) that they don't want to continue
in Scouting, even though they crossed over into the program. We
don't back them over a bridge to take that crossover experience
away from them! (Deb McCormick)
Yup, I think you're
absolutely on the right track! Great approach to new Scouts and
Troop selections. About the only thing I can add is that I've found
it's important to let both the parents and their sons know that no
one's "marrying" the Troop—If they find one they'd rather be in, GO
FOR IT! But, there’s one other thing I need to mention to you—It’s
subtle, but I see a possible “danger signal.” You made reference to
“minimum requirements.” There are NO “minimum requirements”
anywhere in Scouting. There are REQUIREMENTS. Period. Not more;
not less. Please keep this in mind when you’re Scoutmastering and
looking at rank requirements.
Dear Andy,
I’d like to know what
belt loops the Tiger Cubs in my Den can earn after they earn their
Tiger Patch. Could you please help me? Thanks. (Debbie, Tiger Den
Leader, Red Hook, NY)
Great news! The Cub Scout Academics
& Sports activities are definitely available to Tiger Cubs—belt loops
and pins! My host, the U.S. Scouting Service Project, has an excellent
description of this program. Just go here:
http://www.usscouts.org/advance/cubscout/a-s.html
Also, check out your council's Scout
Shop for actual books and pamphlets on these programs and how to carry
them out. Then have a blast! These are fun programs!
Dear Andy,
My Scouter husband’s a wonderful man
and I love him dearly, including everything he does as a volunteer.
Sometime, when he’s talking about situations he’s facing with the units
he serves as a Commissioner, I try to offer suggestions, or ask him what
he’s going to do about it, but when I do this he, he just goes “silent”
on me! I’m trying to help, but it doesn’t seem to be working. Any
advice? (LS, Vermont)
Most men, I
think, like to be fixers and problem solvers. Sorta replaces their
hunter-gatherer instincts and makes up for no more mammoths to slay or
T-Rexes to escape from. So, when a woman starts giving him solutions,
his "caveman’s ear" starts hearing a bid to “be the leader of the
pack.” When this happens, he’s no longer “in charge” while you’re both
facing that T-Rex, and his “problem-solving job” has been taken away
from him! Instead of thinking, “I’m going to tell her how we’re going
to escape with our skins,” he starts thinking, “Oh, now I’ve got to face
that T-Rex and someone who’s bucking for my job, too!” Or, he thinks he
hears, “If you don’t come up with a solution, and darned quick, we're
both gonna get et, and if that happens, it'll be all your fault, and we
wouldn't be in this pickle if I hadn’t listened to you in the first
place!" Now we know the woman didn't actually say that (or, at least,
we hope not!), but that's what the man hears. But, if the woman says
something like, "Hey, that's a hungry-lookin' T-Rex... What do you think
we should do?" then—Ahhh, man at his best here!—the man can come up with
a solution that’ll work! Like, “Race you to that tree over there!" If
you start giving him solutions, you run the risk that he’ll start
thinking, "Well, if you’re so smart, maybe we oughta sit here for a
while and discuss the merits of your idea..." which will shortly be
followed by a large gulp, the sound of crunching bones, and a look of
satisfaction on ol' T's face.
Men have learned very few things
across the millennia... Like, they still haven't figured out that "We
have to talk" means "I have to talk," and he still thinks that
"We'd better get this fixed" means "YOU'd better fix it, or else!" Be
gentle... Men are sensitive creatures, much more fragile than they’ll
admit, mostly because they don't know they are.
So when he talks about a problem,
just listen, and give him easy feedback, like, “Wow,” or “No kidding,”
or “They cannot be serious!” Always remember that, when a man tells his
very best friend about his very deepest concern, all he’s really looking
for is for his best friend to say, “Well, how about them Yankees this
year.”
Dear Andy,
I’m working on my Eagle Scout
Project. I’ll be building an Ark to keep one of my synagogue's Torahs in
that the teenage youth group use. To raise money to build the Ark, I’m
writing an article for the synagogue's newsletter in which I will ask
for contributions to pay for the Ark's construction material. My
question is whether I may say in the article that money donations for my
Eagle project are tax deductible for the people that give me
donations. Also, should I say that I’ll give the donors a receipt for
their donations? (Adam Schuit, Life Scout, Troop 40, West Windsor, NJ)
Congratulations on making it all the
way to your Eagle project! And it certainly looks like a worth-while
one! When it comes to contributions such as the type you need, the "tax
deductible" part depends in part on who contributors will be writing
their checks to. Will they be to "Adam Schuit," or to your synagogue,
or to your Troop, or to the BSA? If it's the synagogue or the BSA, then
they'd turn the money received over to you, and you'd have to work this
out with them ahead of time. If the checks are written to you, you'll
want to open an account that you can put the money in, so that it's
easier to keep track of, especially if you receive more than you need
(and, by-the-way, what you'll do with any extra money should be included
in your project write-up!). (A parent can open the account with you, so
that there's an adult name on it, and then you'll close the account
after the project's completed and all money accounted for.) Anyway, I
think your safest bet would be to say: "Contributions may be tax
deductible—consult with your own accountant or tax preparer." That way,
you're covered, and you don't have to be an expert in taxes! (And I
don't, either!)
Dear Andy,
I have two questions on Eagle
Projects. I’ve been approached with by two different scouts with
projects ideas, and I’m not sure whether they’re worthy enough to be
Eagle projects. One Scout wants to build a wheelchair ramp at a house
of a handicapped individual through an organization that helps the poor
and homeless. The second Scout wants to build a lifeguard tower at a
lake that’s owned by a non-profit homeowners association but has a
public access. Any comments? Any assistance is appreciated—our committee
has been discussing this for a month! (Bruce Blevins)
I can appreciate the trouble you’re
having. Both project ideas are what I'd call "borderline." When I'm
faced with "Solomon's decisions" like these, I make sure to re-read
whatever National BSA language I can find on the subject. This helps me
a great deal, and often saves hours of pondering. So, let's begin by
looking at what Eagle requirement 5, on the application itself, states
(I'm going to capitalize what I think are the key words): “Plan,
develop, and give leadership in a service project helpful to any
RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION, any SCHOOL, or YOUR COMMUNITY." Here, I’m taking
"community" to mean the specific town in which the Scout resides. With
this requirement's exact wording clearly in mind, here's how I,
personally, would vote on these two projects...
The first Scout’s project is being
done for a single individual, and however noteworthy it may be, this
doesn’t fit the categories the requirement describes. If the ramp were
built at the town's community center, and there were multiple users
(thereby benefiting the community as a whole), I'd vote "go for it" in a
heartbeat. But that’s not what it is. Here, counseling with the Scout
to see if his interest in building such a ramp might be gently
redirected toward a more encompassing venue would be my next step.
For the second Scout’s project, a
little more reading might be helpful. In the BSA publication,
"Advancement Committee Policies and Procedures," you'll find this
statement: "For ideas and opportunities...the Scout can consult people
such as school administrators, religious leaders, local government
department directors, or a United Way agency's personnel." It also
states that "businesses" are excluded. Putting these two together, it
becomes apparent to me that merely being "not-for-profit" is not the
same as being a CHARITABLE organization. So, since most homeowners'
associations are, in effect, businesses being run on a not-for-profit
basis, and not truly charitable organizations (that is, you can't donate
money to them and receive an income tax credit), they are just outside
the realm of what the Eagle service project requirement has in mind.
Now, if it turns out that the town owns the lakefront land on which the
lifeguard tower would be built, then I'd think we're OK. If not, I'd
think that the homeowners' association is a little too close to being a
business and a little too far away from being a charitable organization
to qualify as a recipient of an Eagle project.
Dear Andy,
I’m wondering what ever happened to
the “Tom Watt Kit” fund-raisers that I did back when I was a Cub Scout?
I can't find any links or references to them any where on the Web. Do
you have any idea what happened to them or where to find them? (Jason
Smith, ACM, Pennsylvania Dutch Council, Quarryville, PA)
Yes, I remember those, too. Don't
know for sure what happened to them. My guess is that they got
eventually replaced by the National fund-raiser for units and
councils—Trails End Popcorn. If you're looking for a fundraiser, Trails
End is pretty terrific. Great product, excellent "return" to the units
and the Scouts who sell, and helps the council, too! That's sure a
"Win-Win-Win" to me! Contact your council service center, and ask for
the "popcorn colonel (kernel)" for your district!
Dear Andy,
I’ve recently discovered your cyber
advice column and enjoy reading the old entries immensely. Thanks for
all the time and energy you put in on this. My question concerns Wood
Badge. I’ve noticed that sometimes people who get Wood Badge seem to
gradually retire, unofficially, from active participation. Of course,
most don't, but some do. They seem to bask in the glory, so to speak. It
magnifies their egos. I’d like to suggest that one's Wood Badge
certification expire after, say, three years unless they take a
refresher course. Is this a crazy idea? (Bill Ewing, SC-361, Santa Fe,
NM)
Ahhh, Wood Badge... Scouting's oldest
"Old Boys Club." At least, for decades it was usually that way. But
it's been evolving into what it should have been from the very
beginning: a TRAINING COURSE. Open to all (with some obligatory
prerequisites, of course, like—currently—Leader Essentials, etc.). A
training course—nothing more, but certainly nothing less. And the
highest level available to Scouters—volunteers and professionals alike.
A training course that, more than any other, builds on camaraderie and
teamwork. When Wood Badgers get their beads, woggle and Maclaren
neckerchief, some do think it's "the end of the trail," just like some
Scouts think Eagle rank is the end of the trail. Perhaps we need to
borrow a little from the Order of the Arrow: "You are not so much
being recognized for what you have done, but for what you are going to
do."
If camaraderie is the key, as I
believe it well may be, then Wood Badge-trained leaders may need some
further injections of that spirit along the way. It rekindles the fire
of their Scouting commitment, feeds the soul, and takes away the
alone-ness that Scouters sometimes feel. Annual "Wood Badge reunions"
are one way to provide these vital injections. Or perhaps a special
"Wood Badge task-force" to take on a special project at the council's
summer camp facilities. Or something else, anything else, that will
help these dedicated folks recharge their batteries.
But, don't write to somebody—DO
SOMETHING. Start a reunion in your council. Spearhead a Wood Badge
work party at your camp. Run a one-day "Wood Badge Camporee." In short,
find a way to re-connect Wood Badge-trained Scouters with the essence of
why they took this rigorous training (to say nothing of their tickets)
in the first place! DO IT. MAKE IT HAPPEN. In my opinion, we don't
need more training so much as we need places where we can put that
training into action. Atrophy only results from non-use. Keep on using
the skills and there's no atrophy. This is how to keep these dedicated
folks from fading away.
Dear Andy,
I have a third grader who joined our
Pack this past fall. He has completed the Bobcat and Bear
requirements. He wants to work on the Wolf requirements so that he can
receive that badge. Can he do that? (James McLain, CM, Pack 623,
Concord District, Central North Carolina Council)
Cub Scout rank requirements are
age-specific, and you'll find BSA literature that advises against "going
backwards." It's not recommended, because a now 3rd-grader will find
the Wolf requirements considerably less than challenging. For a simple
piece of cloth, it's not worth the effort. What this Cub Scout should
absolutely be doing is racking up lots and lots of Bear-level Arrow
Points! That's where his focus should be, and he should get as many as
his Mom is willing to sew on his uniform! And, after he's earned a ton
of these, there's the World Conservation Award, belt loops and pins for
academics and sports, and big bunches of other stuff that he'll find
interesting and challenging. Point him FORWARD and help him to keep
from going backwards!
Happy Scouting!
Andy
Got a question?
Send it to me at
AskAndyBSA@yahoo.com
-be sure to let me know your Scouting position, town, state, and
council!
(Mid-March 2004 –
Copyright © 2004 Andy McCommish)
|