|
Get your own
ASK ANDY pin! Go to the end of this
column.
Dear Andy,
In 1999,
William Stewart Ward gave me a copy of a poem that he’d written,
titled “Eagles Dare to Win.” He’s an Eagle Scout (1988), Wood Badge
(SC-454), and a Brotherhood member of
Caddo Lodge, in the Greater St. Louis
Council. I’ve lost contact with him and hoping maybe your column might
be able to help me locate him. Thanks! (Charles McNeill, Past SM, Troop
115)
Dear Andy,
In your last column
you wrote: “By way of a bit of history, both Texas and California were
independent republics before they became American states—They're the
only states, in fact, that can claim that distinction!” Woo, Hoo! Are
you going to hear it from those in Hawaii (and a few other places).
Before Hawaii was part of the US, it was an independent kingdom. There
are another five states (or parts) that were independent nations,
including the republics of West Florida, East Florida, and
Vermont.(Michael R. Brown)
Dear Andy,
About state
flags, there was actually another independent republic besides Texas and
California: The Free and Independent Republic of West Florida. Its flag
had a single star, predating the Texas flag by 35 years. I’m aware of
this because my great-great-great-grandfather was a signer of the
Constitution of the Republic of West Florida Republic. (Victor
Stephenson, CM, Pack 685, National Capital Area Council, Springfield,
VA)
Thanks to a bunch of
readers, including Michael and Victor (above), who make sure that I do
my homework better! I'll take twenty lashes with a wet lanyard!
Dear Andy,
We here in the Green
Zone Council read your column. We’re a group of American Scouters,
former Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts USA leaders, and other interested folks,
who meet weekly with Iraqi Scout leaders as they attempt to get their
Iraqi Scouting program back on its feet. (Uncle Buck, Multinational
Force–Iraq)
Keep up the work you
all are doing and know that we're thinking of you every day and behind
you 200%!
Hi Andy,
While at camp a
couple of years ago, some joking around went a bit too far and our
Scouts’ tempers flared a bit. While there technically wasn't any real
physical violence, there was some shoving and I’d heard that one Scout
put another in a head lock. As a result, our Troop’s leaders developed
a "no touching" rule for all Scouts. This means no touching each other
in any way, including the elimination of any type of tag, wrestling,
etc. But many of the parents see this as setting the Scouts up for
failure. Inevitably, dodge ball turns into wrestling, tag turns into
grabbing, etc. On top of all this, we have one very powerful and
controlling leader (not the Scoutmaster) who disciplines the Scouts
engaging in such fun activity by yelling at them (including four-letter
words) and publicly humiliating them. In your experience, have you ever
heard of a no-touching rule and do you think it’s actually enforceable?
Also, is there any code of conduct, particularly related to disciplining
Scouts, that applies to adult leaders? (B.Y.)
A "no touching" rule
(a) is impossible to adhere to, (b) guarantees that "someone" (Gee, I
wonder who?) will have to "discipline" the offender, and (c) about as
stupid an idea as I've ever heard.
There is no
energy-burning activity involving a bunch of teen-aged boys I can think
of that doesn't involve physical contact... except maybe tiddly-winks.
I’m exaggerating, of course, but the point is this: Physical contact is
part of healthy growing up. Take it away and you damage the youth.
(Don’t for a minute think that, well, his school sports teams are
enough, because they’re not—they teach different things than well
thought-through, well run initiative, trust, and team games that we use
in Scouting teach).
Your problem’s not
rambunctious Scouts, it's an ignoramus leader.
How to "evaluate" an
adult leader? Simple. He's the Troop’s primary role model for living
the Scout Oath and Law in his daily life. That's all you need to throw
this nincompoop out, because no lecture will change a bully such as
you’ve described. Any adult who’s yelling at Scouts and publicly (which
I take to mean in front of the other Scouts) humiliating them needs to
be jettisoned before he does any more damage.
Hi Andy,
Is there a BSA
regulation about a Den Chief’s age and rank, or are these something
decided by the Troop, and approved by the Troop and Packs that are
involved? (Robin Bodnar, Advancement Chair, Troop 23B, Connecticut
Rivers Council, Burlington, CT)
Here's the BSA's
written description of the qualifications for Den Chief:
"Den Chief
Qualifications:
An older Boy Scout, Varsity Scout, or Venturer. Selected by the Senior
Patrol leader and Scoutmaster, Varsity Scout Coach, or Venturing
Advisor, at the request of the Cubmaster. Approved by the Cubmaster and
Pack Committee for recommendation to the Den Leader.”
Note that "older" is
undefined. Note, further, that no rank is specified. These things are
absolutely not by accident.
I’ll add this, from
personal experience mentoring three different Scouts, from different
Troops, as Den Chiefs: Neither age nor rank is the critical factor;
what's most critical is the character of the youth himself. In other
words, select your Den Chief based on his attitude first and foremost;
you can always train for skills.
Dear Andy,
For earning the Arrow
of light, one of the requirements is “With your Webelos Den, attend a
Troop meeting and an outdoor Troop activity.” Can these both be done in
one meeting? Some of our Webelos Scouts went to a Troop meeting and,
while they were there, one of the Troop’s leaders took them outside and
they worked on earning the Totin’ Chip. Then they went back inside and
made some fire starters and planned for a District Campout. (Rhonda Hitt,
Pack 4096, Greater Alabama Council, Remlap, AL)
The way you're
written those two requirements, it looks like one. But it's not. Each
Webelos Scout is expected to visit a Boy Scout Troop at least three
times: Twice with his Den (one Troop meeting and one outdoor activity)
and then (at least) once with his parents. Of course, more visits than
these should be encouraged, so that each Webelos Scout can pick his
preferred Troop with his eyes wide open!
Dear Andy,
When a boy joins a
Cub Scout Pack for the first time, I know he’s first supposed to earn
his Bobcat badge. But can he earn and receive any activity pins, or
does he have to get his Bobcat before receiving an activity pin? We
have a boy who joined as a Webelos. He hasn’t earned Bobcat, but he has
earned the Outdoorsman activity pin. Aren’t we supposed to wait until he
earns the Bobcat to present his pin? (Rhonda Hitt, Pack 4096, Greater
Alabama Council, Remlap, AL)
Whenever a Scout
joins Cub Scouting, at any level, the very first thing he does is earn
Bobcat. That way, he's got "the basics" taken care of. After Bobcat, he
can go on to earn whatever he likes in his age/grade program. So, Yes,
he should earn and receive Bobcat first; however, earning Bobcat is
pretty simple and both this and the Outdoorsman can be presented at the
same meeting (Bobcat first, then Outdoorsman).
Dear Andy,
Remember that
"Two-Hats Commissioner” question? Maybe that Scouter saw the great
article about “The Six Hats Worn by Commissioners,” in the winter 2002
"COMMISSIONER" BSA publication? If that’s what she was thinking of,
here’s the link:
www.Scouting.org/Commissioners/newsletter/1-02.pdf
(Barry
Nupen, DC, Kaala District, Aloha Council, Mililani, HI)
Brilliant piece of
detective- and research-work, Barry! Thanks a bunch!
Dear Andy,
Regarding the camping
requirements and the number of nights spent camping for the First Class
requirement of 20 nights, do nights spent as a Boy Scout accompanying an
Cub Scout camp-out count towards that requirement? (Laura Hendrix, South
Plains Council, Shallowater, TX)
Overnight camping requirements for First Class rank and Camping merit
badge are a little bit different from one another. For First Class,
it's stipulated that the minimum of three overnight camping activities
(the actual number of nights is unspecified except that it obviously be
no less than three; what is specified here is that it be a minimum of
three separate occasions) will be with the Scout’s Troop and/or
Patrol. For Camping merit badge, the total number of nights is 20, of
which no more than 7 may be at a long-term (i.e., summer) camp, but the
"Troop and/or Patrol" stipulation is removed, indicating that any night
spent "under the sky” (i.e., in a sleeping bag) or "in a tent you have
pitched" will count, regardless of venue, activity type, or companions.
Consequently, if a Boy Scout camps overnight (not in a cabin or
equivalent) with a Cub Scout Den (but with not his own Troop or Patrol),
then this can definitely count toward the Camping merit badge
requirement, but not the First Class rank requirement. Why would this
be? Because each requirement has a different ultimate purpose, as
reflected in its precise language.
Hello
Andy,
One of our sons
earned First Class and shortly after that asked one of the adult leaders
if he could be Troop Historian, because he needed a position of
responsibility in order to meet his goal of earning Star rank in four
months, and he was told, “Maybe… We'll talk about it later." Later at
that same Troop meeting, another First Class Scout was assigned Troop
Historian, and our son was Assistant Patrol Leader. Subsequently, on
all of his Scout Reports from the Troop, he was listed as holding the
APL position as his "leadership position of responsibility" and was told
that he’d need to attend Junior Leader Training in order for this
position to count towards advancement to Star.
Four months passed.
So he contacted the Troop’s Advancement Chair to verify that he now had
all requirements in place to earn Star. Instead, he was told that
Assistant Patrol Leader doesn’t count toward advancement. Now, he’s
Patrol Leader, but he can’t advance to Star for another three months.
This whole thing is discouraging to him, because he was under the
impression that, as APL, he was serving in a position of responsibility
and had met other requirements for merit badges and service hours.
Nevertheless, he still focused on his goal of earning Star rank by the
Troop’s next Court of Honor. Then, in reading his Handbook, he
discovered the notation about a Scoutmaster-assigned leadership project
as an alternative to holding a leadership position for four
months. He’s willing to work hard on a project, but his Scoutmaster is
resisting doing this because, he says, he’s never seen this done before
and he can't think of anything that the Troop really needs right now.
The Scoutmaster went on to say that he’ll research the idea, but at the
same time he’s concerned about the precedent that it might set for other
Scouts wanting to work on a project in lieu of a leadership position.
My husband and I want to support our son in meeting his goal, especially
since he seems to have found an avenue to do it. For a Scout who’s
motivated, has worked hard, and wants to meet his personal advancement
goals, we are disappointed that the Scoutmaster is not more supportive
at this time. Our son has ideas that he’ll bring to the Scoutmaster at
their next meeting, including putting together the first Troop
Newsletter, doing a scrapbook and/or PowerPoint of the Eagle Projects
done to date, or Troop signs to use while at camp. What you can tell me
about this approach to advancement and if there are any other ideas you
might have for Scoutmaster-assigned leadership projects? Thank you.
(Karen Smith, Omaha, NE)
This is definitely a messy situation. This seems to have happened as a
result of several factors; not just one. Let's first deal with your
son. In both his BOY SCOUT HANDBOOK and also in the BSA book,
BOY SCOUT REQUIREMENTS (any edition or year), the position of
Assistant Patrol Leader does not qualify as a leadership position for
any of the last three Boy Scout ranks—Star, Life, and Eagle—regardless
of what niceties (like JLT) might accompany it, and this cannot be
altered. So, unfortunately, whatever assurance may have been given to
him about JLT assisting in making this position somehow qualify was
painfully misguided. However, it is equally incumbent upon your son to
have seriously questioned or even challenged this, since he’s apparently
an avid reader of his Handbook (as all Scouts should be!)
As for your son's
idea of taking on a special leadership assignment authorized by his
Scoutmaster, this would unquestionably qualify him for the leadership
requirement for the Star rank he's seeking. In fact, his thinking is
nothing less than creatively intelligent, and certainly displays
resourcefulness. Now, as for his Scoutmaster’s conduct over the past
several months, if I were in this Scoutmaster’s shoes, I'd take your son
up on his concept instantly, for two reasons: It shows youthful
initiative and creativity, and would help me, his Scoutmaster, at least
partially redeem myself for first having dragged my heels and then, to
make matters even worse, misinforming this enthusiastic Scout! You see,
I can't hold your son entirely to blame for not challenging whoever told
him that APL plus JLT would qualify him, because, as a Scout conversing
with his Scouting role model, your son would have expected to be dealt
with fairly and honestly, as should be between Scouts and their adult
leaders, and his leaders are expected to know this stuff cold! So as
far as creating a precedent is concerned, maybe it's high time such a
precedent be set, if for no other reason than it provides the Troop’s
leaders with a way out of the mess they, themselves largely created!
You describe your son as "motivated, hard-working, and striving to meet
his personal advancement goals," and based on what you've conveyed here,
I certainly get the impression that this pretty accurate. Consequently,
I have this to say to his Scoutmaster: Sir, you have only one job,
and that's to mentor, support and "grow" the Scouts in your charge.
It's time to do this, equally for all Scouts in the Troop. Now, thanks
to the mess you've created, you have another job: Fix this quickly,
before it expands or escalates further. Oh, Yes, here's a third job for
you: You and at the very least your Troop Advancement Chair need to go
get some current training, so that neither of you ever again misinforms
or misdirects another Scout.
All of this not withstanding, there’s one more element for both your son
and his Scoutmaster to consider: The ideas your son proposed aren’t
“leadership projects;” they’re labor projects. Your son, with guidance
from his Scoutmaster, needs to arrive at something that incorporates
leading other Scouts to the completion of an objective.
Dear Andy,
Is there a Scouting
program for a four year old? (Rebecca Johnson, Indiana)
Unfortunately, there isn’t. Tiger Cubs—the youngest of the Scouting
programs— begins at first grade. Hang in there for just a couple years
more! And thanks for asking!
Dear
Andy,
A Scout asked me to approve assisting at a blood drive for his Star rank
service hours. I don't believe the amount of work required will meet
Star standards, as most of the time he’ll be just sitting around waiting
to sign people in or serving cookies. By "no more, no less," however,
I'm not sure what standards can be enforced. Do I have a basis for
denying permission for these hours to count? (Alan O'Neal, SM, Troop
244, Cary, NC)
A famous baseball umpire was once asked, "How do you really know
whether a thrown pitch is a 'ball' or a 'strike'?" He replied,
"It ain't nuthin' till I call it."
"While a First Class Scout, take part in service projects totaling at
least six hours of work..." If, in your judgment as Scoutmaster, a
blood drive provides insufficient actual "working time," then that's
that—that's your "basis." Which is why the remainder of this
requirement states: "...These projects must be approved by your
Scoutmaster." "In advance" is, of course, the implication here, so you
and this Scout are doing exactly the right thing. The the bottom line
is simple and straightforward: You're the Scoutmaster--It's your call.
Dear
Andy,
Your story about Manuel in Mid-June 2005 sounds like your Scouts call
you by your first name. I'd like my Scouts to call me by my first name,
but I've been counseled against it and don't think the other adults want
to be called by first names, due to respect issues. Some have said it
might be OK for senior Scouts, but not younger Scouts. I feel that
respect is earned; not merely mandated. What’s your counsel on first
names for adult leaders? (Alan O'Neal, SM, Troop 244, Cary, NC)
My own Scoutmaster was Bill. That's what we Scouts called him, back in
the "stodgy" old days of the Eisenhower era, and that's what he
preferred. When I first met him, as a new Scout, he simply extended his
left hand and said, "Hi! I'm your Scoutmaster. My name's Bill...
What's yours?" Simple as that. There was something both honorable and
profoundly approachable in this, because Bill was the only adult
non-relative I knew whom I could call by his first name, and I and the
other Scouts in our Troop never had anything but immense respect for
this privilege.
To my own Scouts, having been a Scoutmaster more than once in my life,
I've always been, simply, Andy. No Scout has ever shown the slightest
disrespect for this, and it has helped to break down barriers that have
led my Scouts to be open and forthright and, to my knowledge, always
honest with me.
On a national youth training course, use of the first name wasn’t
permitted, which we Scoutmasters and other adult staffers regretted but
complied with. However, many of us immediately became "Mister Mac" or
"Mister Dee" or "Mister Kay" to the youth staffers and Scouts, these
being the first sounds of our last names, and this, while not going as
far as we'd have preferred, at least wasn't as stiff and stilted as our
complete last names.
The British have an interesting way of treating this... The Scoutmaster
is referred to as the Troop’s "Skipper" (as on a boat), and his
nickname, used by all Scouts, becomes simply Skip.
So let's get down to it. I agree with you 100 percent: Respect from our
Scouts isn't achieved by using formal names; it's achieved through our
own actions.
True story: I once knew a Scoutmaster who demanded respect but hadn't
earned it. Among other things, he insisted that all Scouts call him
only by his last name: He was MISTER Stundel, and don’t you forget it!
The Scouts, being the clever and phony-spotting Scouts that they were,
instantly reversed the letters of his last name, and so behind his back
he was Mr. LEDNUTS. It stuck. And no amount of hissy-fits on his part
ever made it go away!
If you decide that you'd prefer your first name, then that's that. But
this doesn't mean that all other adults must do this, too. They can
make their own decisions, just as you have. But, whatever YOU decide,
don't let it create a pecking order in your Troop. Whatever you choose,
ALL Scouts call you by that name.
Dear
Andy,
Are the minutes of
the Troop Committee meetings supposed to be only for the committee
members, or are they supposed to be open to all adults in the Troop.
And, who can call an emergency committee meeting, and where can this
information be found? (Ruth)
A quest for bylaws
isn't much different from one in search of the holy grail: Fruitless if
not pointless. Everything a Troop’s volunteer adults need to know in
order to have a successful Scouting program is in the literature and
training materials. (You have all taken training for your positions,
haven't you? Because if you haven't this whole conversation is pretty
darned silly!)
To your questions:
In Scouting, nothing is secret. If you keep minutes or notes of your
committee meetings, this is available to everybody involved with the
Troop, including every parent of every Scout in the Troop.
If an "emergency meeting" is needed (such as, because somebody forgot to
set plans for an upcoming Court of Honor, or the tour permit for a hike
wasn't filled out or sent in) then call the meeting and get as many
folks together as possible. In Scouting unit committee work isn't about
"quorums" and "votes." It’s about getting the job of supporting the
Scoutmaster, the Scouts, and the Troop program as established by the
Patrol Leaders Council done!
Final point: A Troop committee is absolutely, positively,
unquestionably, unarguably NOT some sort of "executive committee," or
“executive board,” or "board of directors," or even "governing body."
You're all there to do jobs that help the Troop move forward. Do
anything else and you're way off base!
Hi Andy,
Our Troop sent two
crews on a Philmont Trek this past summer. Each crew performed community
service while there. Crew 1 chose a service project at their campsite
and worked for three hours. Crew 2 chose for their service project one
that was a one-hour hike away, thereby adding two hours to their three
hours of labor-in-service. First, can our Scouts count this as service
hours for rank advancement? Second, does the crew that spent time
hiking to and from their project site get credit for their travel time
as well as the three hours spent working on the project? (Casey Quinn,
Troop 695, Northern Lights Council, Eden Prairie, MN)
First off,
congratulations on sending two trek crews to Philmont and
congratulations to them for completing their treks and handling a
service project along the way!
To your question: Why is there a "great debate"? To my way of
thinking, Scouting's about giving; not taking away. Here's your choice:
If you give "credit" for just three hours to both crews, you'll be
discouraging these and future Scouts from doing anything that doesn't
"count toward advancement"—the equivalent of "clock watchers" and the
"hey, don't work too hard" mentality. Is this the kind of "happy,
productive, responsible citizens" that Scouting is here to produce as
our "end-product"? If, on the other hand, you give three hours "credit"
to the crew who decided to work in their campsite and not extend the
extra effort to "get out there" (which is OK, by the way) and five hours
credit to the crew who decided go and find a project needed doing that
wasn't necessarily in their back yard (which is equally OK), then you're
fairly honoring the commitment and effort each exhibited.
Dear
Andy,
My neighbors' son has
just earned Eagle, and has invited me to his Court of Honor—reception
and dinner following. Do guests typically present gifts to the honoree
for reaching Eagle Scout status? If so, please provide examples of
suggested gifts. Thank you. (Cathy Walma, Illinois)
How very thoughtful of you! No, it's not "mandatory" that there be a
gift. Your presence will be enough for this singular event in a young
man's life. However, if you feel absolutely compelled to at least check
out options, go to
www.Scoutstuff.org
and then type "eagle" in the keyword or item # dialog box (top right
side of screen). This will take you to a bunch of special items for
Eagle Scouts, in all sorts of prices. If the ceremony is happening very
soon, go to the Scout Shop at the local Boy Scout Council's service
center. They usually have a variety of Eagle items in stock.
To find the Scout Shop, Google
"BSA" and "council" and the name of your
town, and there's a good chance it'll take you to where you need to be.
Dear Andy,
Where do Scouts wear the “Good
Turn” and yearly segments? Can they be worn on the uniform, or are they
just temporary patches? (Diana Dozier, ACM, Greater Alabama Council,
Anniston AL)
These and other
similar patches (Pineweed Derby, Conservation Award, Cub-O-Ree, etc.)
are worn in the "temporary" (meaning that the Scout can change it or
not, at his discretion) position in the center of the right pocket—Just
one at a time, though. Or, if there's a patch already on the right
pocket and the Scout doesn't want to change it, then the new one can go
on the Cub/Webelos Scouts' red patch vest. Or, it can be put in a
collection book or box.
Dear
Andy,
My 16-year-old son
recently received his Eagle Scout rank. I’ve been searching the web,
trying to find out when or if he can wear the actual Eagle medal. He
thinks that as long as he’s not yet an adult, he can only wear the cloth
patch, and that once he’s an adult (age 21?), he then can’t wear the
patch but can wear the pin. But if they can no longer wear the patch,
there are situations that a pin would be impractical. So how would
anyone know he is an Eagle Scout? (Diane Turczynski, Illowa Council,
Davenport , IA)
First,
congratulations to your Eagle Scout son, and your family—the Quad Cities
rule! There are three Eagle Scout indicators: The oval cloth Eagle
Scout badge, the cloth red-white-and-blue "square knot" badge, and the
Eagle medal itself. The oval cloth Eagle Scout badge is worn only by
Boy Scouts (and not ever by adults). It’s centered on the left pocket
of their Scout uniform. The "square knot" is not worn by Boy Scouts,
but only by adults (age 18+) Scouting volunteers who have earned the
rank of Eagle. The medal itself is worn on special occasions, such as
Courts of Honor. It’s pinned just above the uniform shirt's left pocket
flap, centered over the pocket, or at the top of the left breast pocket
of a blazer, sports jacket or suit jacket. It's definitely not worn to
regular Troop meetings, hikes, campouts, and so on.
Dear
Andy,
Does the Scouting
literary award, The Golden Quill, still exist to be earned by Scouts? A
friend of mine got it back in the 60's, and I’ve learned it was a
Lone
Scout award ‘way back. (Don Schultz, ASM, Troop 326, Northeast Georgia
Council, GA)
My amateur research
efforts suggest that the
Gold Quill Award was discontinued quite a few
years ago, but for absolute confirmation, I'd suggest that you write
directly to Mr. Terry Lawson at the BSA National Office—Terry’s the BSA’s National Boy Scout Advancement Director.
Hi Andy,
There’s lots of information and resources available for Unit
Commissioners and Cub Scout Roundtable Commissioners but not a lot for
Boy Scout Roundtable Commissioners. I was told at one time there was a
publication for Boy Scout Roundtables, but it’s been discontinued. Why
are there so few resources for Boy Scout Roundtables? (All I’ve been
able to locate so far is a sample goal-setting plan and a sample
schedule for a year's program.) In that same vein, if Boy Scout
Roundtables are part of continuing Scouter training and dissemination of
information, shouldn’t there be a basic outline, manual, or syllabus on
how to conduct Boy Scout Roundtables and/or at least suggestions of
what is to be presented? (Donald Scott, Boy Scout RTC, Wabash Valley
District, Anthony Wayne Area Council, IN)
My own short answers are: I have no idea, and I agree with you 150%!
I've seen what you're talking about in more than one council—they're all
pretty much the same in this regard. There's virtually no information
available, and Commissioners Colleges often give this subject lip
service at best. This is a real pity. We're supposed to be encouraging
the units we serve to come out to RTs every month, but the dedicated RT
Commissioners and Staff that have accepted the challenge of putting on,
for all intents, a big birthday party every month, month after month,
are given virtually no solid information or resources for doing this
important job—not even a template for meetings! I’m guessing the
question that needs to be asked by every RT Commissioner is this: What
can I do that will make my RTs the most successful in the council? And
then go out and do it!
Dear
Andy,
According to Scout
websites and BSA advancement literature on how to hold a Board of
Review, it’s been said that it’s not an “interrogation,” not a
“re-testing” of a Scout’s competence, not an examination; rather, it
attempts to see that the examinations that went into getting the Scout
signed off were up to standard—it’s a “check-up” to see that what should
have been done actually was done; it’s a “friendly growth experience."
So, then, when should a Scout
not pass a Board of Review?
I’m seeing more and
more Scouts at Troop meetings or activities who are unable to repeat the
Scout Oath or Scout Law, who are unable to tie the most basic of Scout
knots (even the simple square knot), or who are only partly in uniform.
This concerns me when they bring me a Scout book that’s been signed off
by our Scoutmaster or ASM or one of the older Scouts, who says that the
Scout is ready for his Board of Review. This puts the Board of Review
at odds with the Scoutmaster!
If a young Scout
comes before a BOR for the Tenderfoot rank, and can’t say the Scout
Oath or Law from memory, should we go ahead and advance him? What if
the Scout is advancing to First Class or Star? Should the BOR even be
able to ask the Scout to repeat the Scout Oath or Law?
I read the Front Line
Stuff article in “Scouting” magazine about Encouraging Scouts Who Don't
Pass Boards of Review, but it left me with more questions than answers.
Also, within our home Council, I know of a District Board of Review that
didn’t “pass” Scout for the rank of Eagle because of his attitude and
because he hadn’t been in attendance for over six months; however, on
appeal to the Council, they awarded him his rank “…because the
Scoutmaster had signed off on the requirements." Hence it seems to
me that a Board of Review is simply there to "rubber stamp" whatever the
Scoutmaster signs off on. So why do we even have Boards of Review? I
guess my frustration is that I really don't understand what role a Board
of Review really has. Can you help? (Eric Whisler, Troop Advancement
Chair)
A BOR (Board of
Review) is more a "test" of how well the Troop and the Scoutmaster are
delivering the Scouting program to the Scouts you all are serving. If a
Scout comes before a BOR for Tenderfoot rank and stumbles on the Oath
and Law, I'd probably call it "first-timer's jitters" (this is, after
all, his first BOR), and I'd stand up, make the Scout Sign, and say it
with him to help him through. If, however, the Scout’s going for Second
Class or First Class and has trouble, the first thing I'd do is remind
myself that only at the Tenderfoot level is having memorized the Oath
and Law an actual rank requirement, and the second thing I'd do is have
a heart-to-heart talk with the Scoutmaster, asking these two questions:
(1) Why did he send me a Scout who can't repeat the Oath and Law from
memory? and (2) What's going on at Troop meetings that this memorization
isn't happening? In other words, when a Scout is having trouble with
this sort of stuff in a BOR, this is a clear signal that the Troop and
the Scoutmaster aren't doing their jobs the way they're supposed to. In
short, the Troop is failing the Scout, and not necessarily
the other way around!
Square knots? ANY knot? Why are you including this in a BOR? It has
no business there! This is tantamount to "testing" the Scout and that's
not your job. You're dancin' round the wrong campfire on this one, my
friend!
Uniforms? All BSA literature simply says "...in as complete a uniform
as possible." Now if you happen to know with absolute certainty that
Scout does have a complete uniform, and he's chosen not to wear it to a
BOR, then don't even start the review till he's fixed this. But if he
truly doesn't own all the parts, then you can't ding him for that and
your job is to collaborate with the Scoutmaster, the Troop Committee,
and the Scout’s parents to help him afford (and see the value in) those
pants, belt, and socks (these are usually what’s missing)!
Read my
November 2003,
December 2004, and
Mid-December 2004 columns for
more on BORs.
Dear Andy,
For quite some time, our Troop had been holding "Merit Badge Nights"
once a month. The format for these was: Parents who had volunteered to
be Merit Badge Counselors would sit at tables in our meeting hall,
Scouts would go talk to a counselor for a merit badge they were
interested in, then get a blue card from the Scoutmaster, and in
following months spend time with the counselor again to get requirements
signed off. In this way, a number of Scouts would earn merit badges
like Collections, Pets, Reading, and so on. But parents who had offered
to do Law, Salesmanship, Entrepreneurship, Engineering, Aviation, etc.,
would be idle the entire evening. I also observed that only a few
Scouts were actually working on merit badges that interested them. Most
were milling around aimlessly, chatting, or otherwise killing time, and
a few would inevitably get into mischief. A year ago, I became an
Assistant Scoutmaster, and talked this over with the Scoutmaster, who
was himself also new in his position. He and I agreed, so we raised the
issue with the PLC, suggesting that these Merit Badge Nights were not an
efficient use of the Troop’s time. The PLC agreed, and the Merit Badge
Nights were removed from the calendar. Now, nine months later, the
Committee Chair wants so see them resume because "the Scouts haven’t
earned many merit badges in the last nine months." She urged the PLC to
reconsider this at last night's PLC meeting, and they’re ready to
acquiesce. I know how the merit badge process is supposed to work and
what benefits the Scout is supposed to get from earning them through his
own initiative, but what can I say or do to convince the committee that
the purpose of a Troop meeting is not to help Scouts earn merit badges?
(Greg Buliavac, ASM, Troop 186, San Francisco Bay Area Council, CA)
You, your ASM, and your Patrol Leaders Council have it RIGHT! DON'T
CAVE IN ON THIS! Instead, you need to tell your committee chair one
thing, and show her two things. Here they are...
- Tell her in no uncertain terms that the seeking out and earning of
merit badges is based on the initiative of each individual Scout, and
that "spoon-feeding" merit badges is the antithesis of the merit badge
program, process, and goals.
- Show her page 187 in the BOY SCOUT HANDBOOK. Here, it
describes precisely how merit badges are earned, beginning with
selection by the individual Scout.
- Show her the standard Troop Meeting Plan. None of its six parts—preopening,
opening, skills instruction, Patrol meetings, interpatrol activity, and
closing—includes merit badge instruction. If she suggests that merit
badges can be substituted for the "skills instruction" part, point out
that this part is to learn and expand on the skills included in the
ranks up through First Class, because these are the essential skills of
Boy Scouting; merit badges are not. She needs to be informed that the
"skills instruction" part is focused on Scouts teaching Scouts; not
adults teaching Scouts.
Hello Andy,
I’m searching
every site I can find for a list of job descriptions for our Pack
Committee. Do you have any suggestions? I’m looking for what roles the
Committee Chair, Cubmaster, and so on, play. (Jennifer
Pickering, CC, Pack 399, San
Diego Imperial Council, San Diego, CA)
Get yourself a copy of the CUB SCOUT LEADER BOOK. It's available
at your council's Scout Shop or online at
www.Scoutstuff.org.
Everything you're looking for will be there!
YOU ASKED, SO HERE IT IS – THE OFFICIAL
“ASK ANDY”
PIN!

Get your own
ASK
ANDY
pin so your fellow Scouters, friends, and
kids will know that you’re in the know! The pin is brass,
1-inch diameter, with a clasp on the back and full color with a
shiny hard plastic overlay on the front. Download the order form
(click out of this column and look for the order form
“click-through” just below the picture of the pin, on the
netcommish.com web page-left side) and mail it to me. Then,
think about that big grin you’re gonna have when you’re asked, “HEY,
WHERE’D YOU GET THAT?”
Happy Scouting!
Andy
Got a question?
Have an idea? Found something that works? Send it to me at
AskAndyBSA@yahoo.com. (Please include your Council name
or your town & state)
(November 2006 –
Copyright © 2006 Andy McCommish)
|